On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 10:15 AM, raghu <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Shane Mage <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 18, 2011, at 6:52 PM, raghu wrote:
>>
>>> This is a new and intriguing take on the history of warfare, but
>>> somehow does not seem completely plausible. Anyone more knowledgeable
>>> on the subject care to comment?
>>>
>> Hannibal won overwhelming victories in pitched battles at Traseminae
>> and Cannae.
>> A lot of good it did him...or Carthage!
>>
>> And then, of course, there was Pyrrhus of Epirus...
>
>
> It was the example of Pyrrhus that bothered me too, because it is in
> direct contradiction to Whitman's thesis. However we cannot write off
> his thesis if such counter-examples are rare and exceptional.
> -raghu.



To expand on this a bit, Whitman offers the following nuance to
account for the fact that not all historic battles led to decisive
outcomes: he says if the stakes are high enough, the combatants may
choose to simply break the laws of war.

---------------------------------snip
Were battles fought according the rules?  Were they pure games, whose
winners were obliged to
play by the book?  Or were they no-holds-barred descents into brute
violence?  This is a
question that has elicited sharply conflicting views.  Some very fine
scholars, most fa-
mous among them Johan Huizinga, have argued that battles were rule-bound, game-
playing activities. Others have insisted that wars were not fought by
the rules at all.

Chapter Four aims to shed light on this debate. There were meaningful
rules of battle in
the pre-modern Western juristic tradition, the Chapter argues; but we
must think of them
as rules of law, not as rules of a game.  The difference is
fundamental. Games require per-
fect obedience to the rules; law does not. The law is a system of
incentives. It works when
it gives people, in general, good reasons to follow its rules—and it
does not cease to be
the law simply because some people, whether wisely or not, decline to
follow its com-
mands.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to