As people contemplate a Greek exit from the Euro, some are saying: too
logistically complicated, ATMs have to be replaced, etc.

What about a dual-currency system? Many places in the U.S. did this
during the Great Depression; Cuba did this during the special period.
Instead of changing the ATMs, the Greek government could say: everyone
who wants to hold Euros can still hold Euros; everyone who wants to
accept Euros can still accept Euros. But the Greek government is going
to start issuing "new drachmas"; instead of cutting government
salaries and positions and pensions and public spending, it's going to
pay a portion of these bills in "new drachmas"; the government will accept
"new drachmas" for payment of taxes and other government services;
businesses will be strongly encouraged, including through government
leverage, (ie suppliers and contractors) to accept a portion of "new
drachmas" as payment. This would allow the government to increase
public spending and inflate.

> July 17, 2011 1:06 pm
>
> Eurozone exit could restore Greek competitiveness
>
> By Joshua Chaffin in Brussels
>
> It was not easy for Greece to gain admission to one of Europe’s most
> exclusive clubs when it joined the eurozone a decade ago. But leaving it –
> for Athens, or any other member – may prove far more difficult.
>
> European policymakers insist that a Greek departure from the eurozone is not
> even under consideration because the economic and political consequences
> would be so severe.
>
> More
>
>
> On this story
>
> Greek PM says time for Europe to wake up
> Summit raises hopes of Greece deal
> Greek bail-out holds ‘impossible knot’
> Lex S&P and eurozone
> Q&A Greek rollover and rating agencies
>
> However, some analysts and investors see Greece’s exit – even if only
> temporary – as the only way for the country to reduce its costs and boost
> the growth needed to service its huge debts.
>
> Mohamed El-Erian, chief executive of Pimco and a former IMF official, wrote
> in the FT last week that some countries might have to take “a sabbatical
> from the eurozone – but not the European Union – in order to regain the
> policy flexibility needed to restore competitiveness”.
>
> “Short of the eurozone agreeing a fully-fledged transfer union, it is hard
> to see how Greece can remain in the eurozone,” says Simon Tilford, chief
> economist at the Centre for European Reform think-tank. “Leaving would be
> fraught with risk but at least it would hold out the possibility of economic
> growth and escape from the current debt trap.”
> “It is hard to see how Greece can remain in the eurozone”
>
> - Simon Tilford, Centre for European Reform
>
> But to abandon the euro a government would have to confront a welter of
> difficult issues – from printing and distributing new bank notes to
> reconciling the status of existing contracts – from a simple apartment lease
> to major industrial imports – that were signed in one currency and would be
> settled in another.
>
> “Every ATM in the country has to be changed, all cash handlers have to be
> trained. It concerns every supermarket on every corner,” said a European
> banker who worked on the introduction of the euro.
>
> A move to restore the drachma would almost certainly trigger a run on
> domestic banks as people rushed to empty their accounts before
> euro-denominated savings were converted into less valuable coin.
>
> A weaker currency would, in turn, make the country’s euro-denominated debts
> that much more expensive to maintain.
>
> Greece would also have to restore an interest-rate setting capacity to its
> central bank and determine an exchange rate policy – fixed, floating or some
> other arrangement.
>
> The central bank might have to impose capital controls as depositors rushed
> for the exits, although this would contravene the rules preserving the EU’s
> single market, making it more difficult for the country to remain in the
> bloc. Greece might also have to violate the Schengen treaty’s border-free
> travel rules in order to prevent citizens from leaving the country with
> suitcases full of cash.
>
> The turmoil inside Greece would not stop there, according to Andre Sapir,
> the director of Bruegel, the Brussels-based think-tank. While Greece would
> be shut out of financial markets and unable to borrow new funds, so too,
> might other struggling eurozone members as investors tried to guess whether
> they were preparing to follow Athens to the door.
>
> “It would create a huge amount of uncertainty,” Mr Sapir said. “Those
> countries would immediately be frozen out.”
>
> Then there is the legal question of navigating the EU’s treaties which do
> not contemplate the possibility of a country leaving the single currency
> club.
>
> Still, if Greece – or any other eurozone member – decided to go it alone,
> the first step might be to hire a clever Brussels divorce lawyer.
>
> Although the Lisbon treaty, which came into force in 2009, says nothing
> about a country leaving the eurozone, it does include a sort of “catch-all
> clause” that allows the European Commission, the EU’s executive arm, to make
> proposals to deal with extraordinary events.
>
> But such a proposal requires unanimous approval from other member states, as
> well as the consent of an independent-minded European parliament. “It’s a
> tall order that would take time. You couldn’t take it as an overnight
> decision,” said one EU legal expert.
>
> A clearer path would be to leave the bloc altogether. Doing so would require
> only a qualified majority vote by fellow member states.
>
> Achieving even that could be a drawn out process. The parties would first
> have to haggle over the terms, including, for example, the untangling of
> millions of euros in agricultural subsidies and other EU payments.
>
> Daniel Gros, an economist at the Centre for European Policy Studies, argues
> that a country would not willingly leave the eurozone, but might be driven
> out if the European Central Bank were no longer able to fund its national
> banks.
>
> “A country will never be expelled from the EU because of a decision by EU
> leaders. It will be the push of a button in Frankfurt,” Mr Gros said. “At
> that point, you can just try to clean up the mess – and it would be a big
> one.”
>
> The broader truth is that any country determined to leave the club would not
> be held up by legalities. “It’s not like the US – we cannot send in a
> European army,” Mr Gros said. “Even if something is against the treaty, you
> cannot force a country to stay inside.”
>


-- 
Robert Naiman
Policy Director
Just Foreign Policy
www.justforeignpolicy.org
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to