The Republicans think they must stop the Obama/Rubin 'shared' austerity plan
at all costs because they fear  that it would make the confidence fairies
rain good fortune on the US economy and ensure a Democratic sweep in the
next election.

But Rubin has no such delusion. Reading the weak signals of rising commodity
prices and property bubbles worldwide,  Rubin only thinks that his shared
austerity plan is needed now to prevent an even more catastrophic fall in
the economy. i.e. another Great Depression; he does not think that his
shared austerity plan which he proposed as a substitute for a second
stimulus will lift us out of the Lesser Depression.

What is the fundamental mistake in Rubin's analysis? He cannot easily be
accused of crass bourgeois bias; he is calling for bigger estate taxes and
higher marginal rates. But of course he is bourgeois in another way: it does
not occur to him that a system that presents only the alternatives of a
Lesser and Greater Depression has itself become intolerable.

LR
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to