I dont think the Copenhagen interpretation opposes materialism in the name of 
dialectics, instead it interprets the quantum mechanics in terms of the Machian 
instrumentalist philosophy that Lenin attacked in Materialism and Empiro 
criticism.
________________________________________
From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Joseph Green [[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2011 7:03 PM
To: Progressive Economics
Subject: Re: [Pen-l] Sokal Hoax

Ooops. In the previous note by this name that I just sent, drop the ">" from
the paragrah beginning "From the conceptions of various quantum physicists".
It is not a quote from Lakshmi Rhone but part of my reply.

Lakshmi Rhone wrote:

> http://www.mathematik.uni-muenchen.de/~bohmmech/BohmHome/sokalhoax.html
>


Precisely! I pointed out earlier in this discussion that Neils Bohr and the
followers of the Copenhagen school in quantum mechanics opposed materialism
in the name of dialectics, and thus deserved to be regarded as  vintage
postmodernists.

>From the conceptions of various quantum physicists, it follows that the
issue
raised by modern science is the compatibility of materialism and dialectics.
The postmodernists, along with Bohr, oppose materialism. And certain leftist
scientists -- including Sokal and Bricmont apparently -- believe that, to
uphold materialism, they have to denounce dialectics.

.....



-- Joseph Green
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

The University of Glasgow, charity number SC004401
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to