The cuts *so far* are about what the Pentagon was already starting to
prepare for as a result of Obama's directive. The cuts that would come
as a result of the automatic trigger, or if something like that is
included in the Gang of Twelve agreement, are a different story.

A trillion dollar cut over 10 years would be a 15% reduction in
Pentagon spending compared to current plans.

If the trigger happened, it would be $884 billion, about what the Gang
of Six agreed.

A $350 billion cut over 10 years - which the White House says was
agreed to in the first round (extrapolating from the first round), and
which is roughly equivalent to the $400 billion in cuts over 12 years
that the Administration already directed the Pentagon to prepare,
would roughly hold the Pentagon at 2% inflation a year and would be a
7% cut from currently projected spending.

Ezra knows less about this than I do.

On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Gar Lipow <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Robert Naiman
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> The thing is, reality just turned a corner. When forced to choose
>> between raising taxes and cutting the military budget, Republicans in
>> Congress chose to cut the military budget. It is likely that if
>> Republicans in Congress are forced to confront this choice again - and
>> it is likely that they will be so confronted - they will choose again
>> to cut military spending, rather than raise taxes.
>
>
> Not really. According to Ezra and number of mainstream commentators
> the cuts were compared to no change in military spending. Whereas some
> very modest reductions were already in future pentagon plans. And
> these cuts were actually smaller than what the Pentagon planned. So
> in truth the "cut" was a modest INCREASE for the Pentagon compare to
> their existing plans.
>
> Facebook: Gar Lipow  Twitter: GarLipow
> Grist Blog: http://www.grist.org/member/1598
> Static page: http://www.nohairshirts.com
> _______________________________________________
> pen-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
>



-- 
Robert Naiman
Policy Director
Just Foreign Policy
www.justforeignpolicy.org
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to