from SLATE:

Get Krugman!

By David Weigel

 Posted Monday, Sep. 12, 2011, at 12:07 PM EDT

Early on Sunday morning, as the rest of NYTimes.com was turned over to
9/11 anniversary, Paul Krugman vented his spleen. Years of columns
were condensed into a few pithy lines. "What happened after 9/11 — and
I think even people on the right know this, whether they admit it or
not — was deeply shameful," he wrote. "The atrocity should have been a
unifying event, but instead it became a wedge issue. Fake heroes like
Bernie Kerik, Rudy Giuliani, and, yes, George W. Bush raced to cash in
on the horror. And then the attack was used to justify an unrelated
war the neocons wanted to fight, for all the wrong reasons."

These were sentiments he'd expressed before, but he knew they'd set
people off. He turned off the comment section. "I didn't have time to
sift through the predictable vast pile of obscene and threatening
stuff looking for the rare entries that were fit to print," Krugman
says. So the reaction occurred away from the blog, on Twitter and in
other columns. Jennifer Rubin accused him of "hatred and contempt for
his countrymen." Donald Rumsfeld picked up the essential tool of the
angry op-ed reader:

"After reading Krugman's repugnant piece on 9/11, I canceled my
subscription to the New York Times this AM."

On a day when everyone else was flashing back to 9/11/2001, I was
flashing back to the days and months later, when criticism of the Bush
administration returned, and the practitioners of it became, briefly,
Emmanuel Goldsteins. Remember Susan Sontag? Remember the Dixie Chicks?
Remember the campaign to "revoke the Oscar" from Michael Moore? There
hasn't been much criticism of the substance of Krugman's remarks;
denying that 9/11 and counterterrorism strategy became "wedge issues"
is denying a few years of political history. The criticism is of
Krugman for expressing it. He brushes the criticism right off.

"I'm not saying anything in that post that I wasn't saying back in
2002, when people like him were riding high," says Krugman. "And isn't
Rumsfeld 'sweep everything up, related and not' the poster child for
9/11 exploitation?"

If you've forgotten the "sweep everything up" reference, there's a
refresher here:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/09/04/september11/main520830.shtml

-- 
Jim Devine /  "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your
own way and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to