Excellent expose. However, the papers you called nice from the mainstream actually by omitting power produce knowledge that contributes to the already distorted balance of power. So by omitting power they suck up to the power that be and part and parcel of the reproduction of power.
Sent from T-Mobile G2 with Google michael perelman <[email protected]> wrote: >What have I done wrong to be put in such a position? > >On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Eugene Coyle <[email protected]> wrote: >> A very nice paper Michael. I hope it is the basis of your Presidential >> address to the next AEA convention. >> >> Gene >> >> On Sep 29, 2011, at 8:12 PM, michael perelman wrote: >> >>> I just finished a draft of paper regarding the exclusion of the >>> concept of power in economic theory. >>> Any comments will be appreciated. >>> >>> http://michaelperelman.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/power.pdf >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Michael Perelman >>> Economics Department >>> California State University >>> Chico, CA >>> 95929 >>> >>> 530 898 5321 >>> fax 530 898 5901 >>> http://michaelperelman.wordpress.com >>> _______________________________________________ >>> pen-l mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l >> >> _______________________________________________ >> pen-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l >> > > > >-- >Michael Perelman >Economics Department >California State University >Chico, CA >95929 > >530 898 5321 >fax 530 898 5901 >http://michaelperelman.wordpress.com >_______________________________________________ >pen-l mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
