The resumption of Arab history
2011-10-08

By Rami G. Khouri

The momentous nature of several events in the Middle East has prompted
many analysts or commentators to focus on a few issues and give them
primacy in shaping the transformation of the region. These include the
Arab citizen revolts across the region, a veritable new Arab
awakening, the rise of Turkey’s role and the Palestinian initiative to
seek statehood recognition at the United Nations.

These are indeed game-changing developments, but they should not
detract from the much wider array of changes under way that represent
a rare moment of historic and strategic transformation.

The following ten issues are critical changes that together define
this new strategic environment:

1. The Middle East has probably reached the limits of what can be
achieved through conventional warfare between Arabs and Israelis, or
Iranians also, following the destruction that was demonstrated in the
last two Israeli wars on Lebanon and Gaza in the past five years. The
doctrines of deterrence and resistance will now be assessed in new
terms.

2. The United States continues to marginalise itself as a credible or
forceful actor in the region, except for its increasingly one-sided
support for Israel. Washington has very little influence today with
the four principal national actors in the Middle East - Arabs,
Israelis, Turks and Iranians. They all routinely rebuff its overtures
and ignore its pressures and threats. The United States is the world’s
strongest power, but also the weakest power in the Middle East.

3. The ongoing Arab citizen revolts are changing a region that was
once defined by autocrats and police states to one more widely infused
with mechanisms of popular and participatory democracy, real
constitutionalism and the consent of the governed, with a strong
cross-cutting demand for more social justice among newly liberated and
empowered citizens. The emerging new Arab world will be defined much
more than before by the concepts of the rule of law and social equity.

4. Iran and Turkey are both in the process of having to adjust their
relations and policies in the region, in view of their evolving
domestic conditions and the new realities in the area.

5. The political transition in Egypt has quickly shown that this
country will play a role in the Middle East that echoes its days half
a century ago, when it was a trendsetter for the Arab region, a shaper
and player in the realm of Arab national interests and dignity, and a
leader in the confrontation with Israel (without going to war with
Israel).

6. The steady isolation of Israel (with its American ally and
protector), due primarily to its own aggressive policies against
Palestinians and other Arabs, creates a new reality in which Israel’s
traditional leading asset - its military superiority - is less and
less relevant to political changes in the region, as nationalist
confrontations are increasingly articulated in political and populist
terms, rather than in gunfights.

7. The global tendency to reaffirm the concept that states or
individuals are legally accountable for their actions is being given
life through mechanisms such as the International Criminal Court,
Security Council sanctions, special tribunals and other organs of the
UN system. The Goldstone Report was one example of this, and the
hysterical American-Israeli reaction to curtail it merely emphasises
how worried the United States-Israel combine is about being subjected
to international legal, political and ethical accountability.

8. The Fateh-led Palestinian initiative at the UN in September
represents a timely example of how even weak and vulnerable parties
that are not recognised states can shake up the global political
system and initiate new dynamics through bold action. The realisation
that the powerless actually have power will come into play more
frequently in the months and years ahead, as regional and global
confrontations shift from the battlefield to the courthouse and the
councils of international organisations.

9. The request for UN recognition of a Palestinian state also
represents an important shift away from failed American mediation in
the Arab-Israeli conflict towards an attempt to address and resolve
this conflict through more legitimate and effective forums, at the UN
and elsewhere.

10. The renewed activism of Palestinian refugees around the region and
the world, and the continued development of the Palestinian movement
to boycott, sanction and divest from Israel until it grants the
Palestinians their legal rights also represents an important and
fundamental shift into a new arena of combat on the basis of
challenging Israel’s predatory and racist policies against
Palestinians. More and more frequently, “Israel” and “apartheid” are
used in the same sentence, which means global reactions to Israeli
policies will become increasingly hard.

This wider perception of changes under way across the Middle East may
offer a more complete view of how individual developments link
together to create a new foundation for the resumption of national
history that was stunted, and essentially suspended, in our region for
over half a century.

http://en.ammonnews.net/article.aspx?articleNO=14042

--
"Hige sceal þe heardra, heorte þe cenre, mod sceal þe mare, þe ure
mægen lytlað."
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to