The most interesting feature of the article was that Wall Street
Journal did not present the protesters as crazies.  Robert's
interjection is made to sound reasonable.  I would like to think that
this nuanced change might be a sign of a positive mood swing in
society.

On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Robert Naiman
<[email protected]> wrote:
> But the protests that punctuated Tuesday's Senate Finance Committee
> vote suggested that some lawmakers could pay a price at the voting
> booths in 2012 when the next elections are held. Senate Finance
> Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D., Mont.) had to put the session on
> hold while police escorted protesters out of the hearing room—and even
> then, the disruptions continued.
>
> http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203499704576625543532685026.html
>
> Senate Panel Clears Korea, Colombia, Panama Trade Pacts
> By SIOBHAN HUGHES
> OCTOBER 11, 2011, 7:13 P.M. ET
>
> WASHINGTON—The Senate Finance Committee on Tuesday approved trade
> deals with South Korea, Colombia and Panama, brushing aside opposition
> from labor unions and some manufacturers in an effort to ratify pacts
> first negotiated more than four years ago.
>
> The panel cleared the Colombia pact 18-6 and approved the other two
> deals by voice vote. The deals are forecast to generate $13 billion a
> year in exports and are expected to clear both the House and the
> Senate on Wednesday. The trade agreements have been cast by both the
> Obama administration and congressional leaders as a way to boost the
> U.S. economy.
>
> Republicans and Democrats have been fighting for years over the trade
> deals, reflecting longstanding tension over whether phasing out
> tariffs winds up boosting growth or costing U.S. jobs. Unions are
> coming out against the trade pacts, and have stepped up a lobbying
> campaign since President Barack Obama submitted the agreements to
> Congress last week.
>
> Democratic lawmakers began showing more support for the trade pacts
> since the deals have been reworked. A final breakthrough came when
> Republican leaders agreed to go along with the renewal of a
> worker-retraining program that helps workers who lose jobs because of
> overseas competition. The program, known as Trade Adjustment
> Assistance, would be scaled back after a 2009 expansion as some
> Republicans complain that the assistance is a waste of money.
>
> But the protests that punctuated Tuesday's Senate Finance Committee
> vote suggested that some lawmakers could pay a price at the voting
> booths in 2012 when the next elections are held. Senate Finance
> Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D., Mont.) had to put the session on
> hold while police escorted protesters out of the hearing room—and even
> then, the disruptions continued.
>
> Sen. John Kerry (D., Mass.) at one point appeared to address the
> audience directly, saying that "these agreements are fairly one-sided
> in our favor—they actually open up markets that are closed to us." He
> added that "these agreements actually create jobs for Americans."
>
> "That's not what the International Trade Commission said," replied a
> man who later identified himself as Robert Naiman, policy director for
> Just Foreign Policy.
>
> "The tariff cuts alone in the U.S.-South Korea trade agreements could
> increase exports of American goods by $10 billion to $11 billion," Mr.
> Kerry continued.
>
> "What about imports?" replied Mr. Naiman, who managed to keep his
> voice just low enough to avoid being escorted out of the room. Mr.
> Naiman later added: "Workers supported you, Sen. Kerry. Why aren't you
> listening to workers now?"
>
> --
> Robert Naiman
> Policy Director
> Just Foreign Policy
> www.justforeignpolicy.org
> [email protected]
> _______________________________________________
> pen-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
>



-- 
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA
95929

530 898 5321
fax 530 898 5901
http://michaelperelman.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to