"... So what is the path forward?

"Before we answer that, we have to decide what is the end game.  What
is the result we want to achieve.  Unfortunately, and after 65 years
of this struggle, we still do not have a truly unified call.

"People often ask me which proposal do I support, the one state or the
two state.  It seems those are the only two proposals in people’s
mind.  That it has to be one or the other and we end up struggling for
one or the other.  We waste precious time and energy debating the
merits of one over the other.  Which is better, we ask: The Two State
Solution - ostensibly based on the 1967 borders; or the One State
Solution - which would presumably include all of Palestine for all her
inhabitants.

"The fundamental problem with both of these proposals is that they are
concentrating on the political construct and of statehood.   And I
think that is the wrong approach.

"If we drill down to what we really want, what we all want and all can
agree on: it is to live dignified lives in our own homeland, with full
human and civil rights accorded to everyone there equally regardless
of religion.

"I know this sounds a lot like the One State proposal; but it differs
in that it is simply a call for basic rights.  It is not a call for a
particular political construct because frankly, it doesn’t matter what
the political construct looks like, as long as all our basic human
rights are upheld, and that includes our natural right to return and
live in our own homeland.

"This, in my opinion, is what we should be working toward.  Calling
for our natural rights as human beings and as an indigenous people is
what unifies us all.  To be accorded human rights is our rightful
inheritance.  It is the rightful destiny of human beings not to be
subjugated, expelled or oppressed.  The call from Palestinian Civil
Society, which originated inside the occupied territories, is the best
starting place framework.  In any event, we are in great need of a
consensus for a unified and uncompromising call founded on the goal of
human dignity.  This can form the frame of reference for whatever
actions we take.

"So, I would say, do NOT think in terms of a political construct; but
to think in terms of human rights.  In terms of human dignity and
human worth that is not measured by religion.  This is a goal that
will unify us and will strengthen our collective efforts that pour
into the same movement for freedom ..."

http://palestinechronicle.com/view_article_details.php?id=17181

--
"Hige sceal þe heardra, heorte þe cenre, mod sceal þe mare, þe ure
mægen lytlað."
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to