On 11/3/2011 11:19 AM, Jim Devine wrote:
> A lot of what I've read suggests that on the "horizontal" dimension,
> Smith leaned a bit toward 20th century liberalism (e.g., anti-trust)
> rather than being a pure proponent of 19th century liberalism (i.e.,
> _laissez faire_). But on the vertical -- class -- dimension, it's
> clear to me that he was pretty conservative, not having any respect
> for the working poor, for example. He also saw little difference
> between the craft workers and their "masters." This reflects the
> conditions of his time and place, where mobility between being an
> employee and an employer went both ways (sort of like in some sectors
> of construction in the US until recently). But people often assume
> that this part of Smith's view still applies, which is a mistake.
> (Any correction of my impressions about Smith would be appreciated.)




> Review
> Dogan Göçmen, The Adam Smith Problem. London: Tauris, 2007. 189 pp. ISBN
> 9781845114008 hardback, £59.50. Reviewed by Paul Cockshott.1
> This book reveals a very different Adam Smith. It reveals a Smith far removed
> from the unconditional advocate of free-market economics that he is often
> thought to be. The problem referred to is: how are we to reconcile two 
> apparently
> distinct Smiths? On the one hand, the well-known Smith of The Wealth
> of Nations, perceived as an advocate of commercial society; on the other, the
> moral philosopher who wrote The Theory of Moral Sentiments, perceived as an
> advocate of a notion of sympathy that seems quite at variance with the 
> capitalist
> ethos. Göçmen’s aim is to show that these two apparently different Smiths
> were exponents of a single unified philosophical position, which was moreover
> much more critical of what later came to be called capitalism than might
> initially be supposed. It is a bold claim, but one that Göçmen goes a 
> considerable
> way towards establishing.

full: http://www.equinoxjournals.com/JCR/article/viewArticle/6451
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to