On Dec 27, 2011, at 11:12 PM, Sandwichman wrote: > On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Shane Mage wrote: > > For all their bombast, it seems they have no understanding of Marx. > > And they pass this off as some sort of "Marxism!" > > Give me a couple of hours and I could find evidence that Marx "had > no understanding of Marx." I won't bother, though, because Marx > already said he was no Marxist, so it would be beating a dead horse.
What do you think Marx was talking about when he said that? (hint-it had something to do with mechanical misinterpretations of a passage in the Introduction to the Critique of Political Economy). Given a couple of centuries you still won't find evidence that Marx repudiated anything in Das Kapital. Shane Mage "All things are an equal exchange for fire and fire for all things, as goods are for gold and gold for goods." Herakleitos of Ephesos, fr, 90 _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
