Interesting. Accusing Iran in what passes for description occurs in other
cases. I have noticed that news reports speak of Iran sentencing to death an
alleged U.S. spy. Even though convicted the person is not called a spy but an
alleged spy. At the least one could simply say he was convicted of spying
rather than directly questioning the verdict in the description. Instead there
is implied but unsupported implicit critique of the verdict in the very
description.
Cheers, ken
Blog: http://kenthink7.blogspot.com/index.html
Blog: http://kencan7.blogspot.com/index.html
________________________________
From: c b <[email protected]>
To: pen-l <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 9, 2012 1:40:39 PM
Subject: [Pen-l] The New York Times misleading public on Iran
http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2012/01/20121872656281735.html
Robert Naiman is Policy Director at Just Foreign Policy.
RSSTwitter Just Foreign Policy
The New York Times misleading public on Iran
The paper has made faulty allegations about Iran's nuclear programme
without running proper corrections
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
