Sandwichman:

I would challenge the implicit assumption that surplus value is first
produced and then redistributed. It might seem "intuitively obvious" that
you can't redistribute something that doesn't exist yet but of course you
can. You just distribute claims on future wealth creation. That's what
capitalization is about.

So I have in mind a model where profit, interest and rent come first and
then the imperative is to extract the surplus value corresponding with those
claims. Of course the process is circular, so it would be difficult to point
to a specific unit of surplus value going to a specific rent, interest or
profit claim.

=====

This, in particular the "Of course the process is circular," fits in with my
enthrallment with the first long section of Volume II -- which catches up so
beautifully this endless circle, and the way one 'element' merges into
another. 128 pages of one repetition after another of a tautology, yet by
the end of those pages the vast difference between capitalism and other
social orders emerges forcefully.

Carrol

_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to