Jim,

Just an extra point, in case you decide to do the exercise.  I'll then
let it go:

If you think that using the whole value added as the proxy for surplus
value is too clumsy and want to get a bit more detailed, then use the
share of (real) consumption that the PWT has.  Go Kaleckian (assume
workers consume their wages, capitalists invest their profits).  And
see how that alters things.

Or think of what happened to wages in the older richer countries over
the period.  In the U.S., we know wages went up with GDP/capita or
GDP/worker (not the same, but hey) up to the early 1970s, but then
they went down.  So, yes, the profit rate got a little break.  Still,
the ceiling kept falling down (or at most, during the 1990s, it went
flat).  Etc.

Got to keep grading.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to