raghu  wrote:
>  - Unions as they currently exist (corrupt, undemocratic
> special-interest lobbyists for the labor aristocracy, and enablers for
> the financiers)

Let's be specific rather than broadcasting empty generalities. Some
unions are corrupt (e.g. the Laborers International), while others are
undemocratic (e.g., the SEIU) without being corrupt in the usual
meaning of that word, i.e., taking bribes and the like. Some are
neither (like the UE, I understand). Many unions are democratic
(especially at the local level), but these are typically craft unions,
which are inclusive (a bit like fraternities) and almost always act as
special-interest groups (like the AMA and other professional
organizations). I'm not sure exactly what the "labor aristocracy" is,
but many or most craft unions tend toward acting that way. (We
leftoids have always advocated replacing craft unions with more
inclusive industrial unions and the like.) The phrase in the
parentheses makes more sense if we replace the word "and" with
"and/or" or "or."  Putting "most" at the start of the sentence helps
too.

It's wrong to talk about unions without putting them into context,
i.e., their relations with capitalist management. To some extent, all
labor unions have to act as special-interest lobbyists (usually for
the industry they're in). It's a survival strategy for dealing with
management's attacks (or even to ally with management). The
Truman-McCarthy era shoved unions away from anything but this kind of
political strategy, as Taft-Hartley was imposed and commies were
purged, etc.

In a period like the one we're living in, the percentage of craft
unions in total membership rises because they're better at such
strategies. The public-sector unions are currently under severe attack
as people like Scott Walker try to reduce public-sector unionism to
the situation of non-craft unions in the private sector (i.e., dying).

Labor unions are hardly the only enablers of financiers. Others
include almost all governments (state, local, federal) in the US and
public pension plans. Yet more include those who work in the finance
industry.
-- 
Jim Devine / If you're going to support the lesser of two evils, you
should at least know the nature of that evil.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to