(A good contribution if a bit naive about the capacity of the 
government to enact useful conservation measures.)

NY Times Op-Ed July 23, 2012
Will Drought Cause the Next Blackout?
By MICHAEL E. WEBBER

Austin, Tex.

WE’RE now in the midst of the nation’s most widespread drought in 
60 years, stretching across 29 states and threatening farmers, 
their crops and livestock. But there is another risk as water 
becomes more scarce. Power plants may be forced to shut down, and 
oil and gas production may be threatened.

Our energy system depends on water. About half of the nation’s 
water withdrawals every day are just for cooling power plants. In 
addition, the oil and gas industries use tens of millions of 
gallons a day, injecting water into aging oil fields to improve 
production, and to free natural gas in shale formations through 
hydraulic fracturing. Those numbers are not large from a national 
perspective, but they can be significant locally.

All told, we withdraw more water for the energy sector than for 
agriculture. Unfortunately, this relationship means that water 
problems become energy problems that are serious enough to warrant 
high-level attention.

During the 2008 drought in the Southeast, power plants were within 
days or weeks of shutting down because of limited water supplies. 
In Texas today, some cities are forbidding the use of municipal 
water for hydraulic fracturing. The multiyear drought in the West 
has lowered the snowpack and water levels behind dams, reducing 
their power output. The United States Energy Information 
Administration recently issued an alert that the drought was 
likely to exacerbate challenges to California’s electric power 
market this summer, with higher risks of reliability problems and 
scarcity-driven price increases.

And in the Midwest, power plants are competing for water that 
farmers want for their devastated corn crops.

Unfortunately, trends suggest that this water vulnerability will 
become more important with time.

Population growth will mean over 100 million more people in the 
United States over the next four decades who will need energy and 
water to survive and prosper. Economic growth compounds that 
trend, as per-capita energy and water consumption tend to increase 
with affluence. Climate-change models also suggest that droughts 
and heat waves may be more frequent and severe.

Thankfully, there are some solutions.

The government can collect, maintain and make available accurate, 
updated and comprehensive water data, possibly through the United 
States Geological Survey and the E.I.A. The E.I.A. maintains an 
extensive database of accurate, up-to-date and comprehensive 
information on energy production, consumption, trade and price. 
Unfortunately, there is no equivalent set of data for water. 
Consequently, industry, investors, analysts, policy makers and 
planners lack the information they need to make informed decisions 
about power plant siting or cooling technologies.

The government should also invest in water-related research and 
development (spending has been pitifully low for decades) to seek 
better air-cooling systems for power plants, waterless techniques 
for hydraulic fracturing, and biofuels that do not require 
freshwater irrigation.

We should encourage the use of reclaimed water for irrigation, 
industry and the cooling of equipment at industrial operations 
like smelters and petrochemical complexes. These steps typically 
spare a significant amount of energy and cost. The use of dry and 
hybrid wet-dry cooling towers that require less water should be 
encouraged at power plants, since not all of them need wet cooling 
all the time. As power plants upgrade their cooling methods to 
ones that are less water-intensive, these operations can save 
significant volumes of water.

Most important, conservation should be encouraged, since water 
conservation results in energy conservation, and vice versa.

New carbon emissions standards can also help save water. A plan 
proposed by the Obama administration (requiring new power plants 
to emit no more than 1,000 pounds of carbon dioxide per megawatt 
hour generated) would encourage utilities to choose less carbon- 
and water-intensive fuels. Conventional coal plants, which are 
very thirsty, exceed the standards proposed by the president. But 
relatively clean, and water-lean, power plants that use wind, 
solar panels and natural gas combined cycle, would meet them. 
Thus, by enforcing CO2 limits, a lot of water use can be avoided.

Because rivers and aquifers can span many states (or countries), 
because there is no alternative to water, and because water 
represents a critical vulnerability for our energy system, 
governments at all levels have a stake in working with industry to 
find solutions. The downsides of doing nothing — more blackouts — 
are too serious to ignore.

Michael E. Webber is an assistant professor of mechanical 
engineering and the associate director of the Center for 
International Energy and Environmental Policy at the University of 
Texas, Austin.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to