The whole POINT of military spending is to provide a market for high tech and 
other capital goods.  So why fantasize a scenario with more spending on people?


On Aug 14, 2012, at 11:11 AM, Jim Devine wrote:

>> In the December 2011 Pollin paper, $1 billion in military spending
>> creates 11,200 jobs, whereas $1 billion in domestic spending creates
>> at least 15,100 jobs by the least job-creation-efficient means (tax
>> cuts for personal consumption.)
> 
> For what it's worth, I don't believe this story. The idea is that
> military spending is "capital intensive," but that could be fixed by
> bringing back the draft and making the armed forces less
> capital-intensive and high-tech. (One of the last times the US had
> sustained full employment was during the Vietnam war.) Even if
> military spending is necessarily more capital intensive, the demand
> for capital goods raises the demand for labor indirectly (since
> capital goods have to be produced by labor). It's more plausible to
> say that, given the location US wars and military bases, military
> spending has a bigger import component than does civilian spending (so
> that a lot of "job creation" occurs outside the US economy). But as I
> understand it there are a bunch of legislative restrictions on the use
> of military funds (weapons shouldn't be bought from "foreigners") that
> don't apply to purchases by civilians (or for that matter, people who
> work for the military domestically). I don't have enough information
> to say which is more important. But maybe we should argue that the way
> to shift job creation to the US would be to close foreign military
> bases and end the wars.
> 
> -- 
> Jim Devine / If you're going to support the lesser of two evils, you
> should at least know the nature of that evil.
> _______________________________________________
> pen-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to