On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Carrol Cox <[email protected]> wrote: > Krugman & the Republicans (and almost everyone else) share an assumption: > that we are in a 'crisis' which constitutes a 'problem,' and that the task > is to 'solve' that problem. But what if Foster's title and his argument are > accurate? Then it is not a 'problem' that we have to deal with but a new > normality, and a more stable one (in terms of the capitalist system though > not in terms of the status of households). An _endless crisis_ is a > _stable_ state ("stagnang" & "stable" re synonyms but merely reflect > different subjective responses to the same actuality. The precariousness of > life will then discipline the working classes. >
An interesting perspective. In what sense, would such a state be "stable" though? -raghu. _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
