Michael Nuwer wrote: > Nevertheless, Krugman seems to imply that a return to higher taxes and > higher wages would be compatible with a return to economic prosperity. > He is generally unwilling to explore the argument that prosperity in > 1950s and 1960s owes itself to the hegemonic power of the United States, > and so made higher taxes and higher wages possible. I'm not sure that > that possibility exists today, which leaves Krugman's argument a bit > hollow.
you're right, but his statement isn't a whopper as much as one version of the hegemonic perspective. -- Jim Devine / "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your own way and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante. _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
