I saw the film tonight. Tarentino has the intellect of a 14 year old
combined with awesome technical skills. The film is fun. If Mel Brooks can
have fun with the Inquisition and the Nazis, I don't see the problem with
Django. This film is "Inglorious Basterds" but about slavery, through the
medium of the spaghetti Western.

Additional comments interspersed below.

On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Louis Proyect <[email protected]> wrote:

> http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/01/01/hollywoods-nigger-joke/
> Tarantino's "Django: Unchained"
> Hollywood’s Nigger Joke
> by CECIL BROWN
>
> . . .
>
> Ishmael Reed, the novelist, pointed out how the Weinstein Company
> promoted an advertising campaign to get a black audience by promoting
> Jamie Foxx as the star. In fact, Foxx is only one of the stars, along
> with Christoph Waltz and  Leonardo DiCaprio. As Reed points out, Foxx
> spends most of his time looking at Mr.Waltz and then looking at Mr.
> DiCaprio, with a puzzled look on his face, as if to say, What’s dese
> white folks, talkin ‘bout?
>
> >>> (MBS) This last is utter bullshit. I usually like Reed, by the way.

 . . .

If  Jackson had not dominated the Hollywood system in such a sly way,
> then his role as Stephen,  the  master-worshipping house slave to Calvin
> Candie (Leonardo DiCaprio) would not have its loaded, edgy, uncanny
> realism. The plantation is called CandieLand (Candyland) and is meant to
> refer to Hollywood itself as a producer of entertainment (Candy). Get it?
>
> >>> (MBS) More nonsense. There is no Hollywood subtext in the film. None.


> . . .
>
> The plot of Django:Unchainedis: “With the help of his mentor, a
> slave-turned bounty hunter sets out to rescue his wife from a brutal
> Mississippi plantation owner.” And: “Former dentist, Dr. King Schultz,
> buys the freedom of a slave, Django,and trains him with the intent to
> make him his deputy bounty hunter. Instead, he is led to the site of
> Django’s wife who is in the hands of Calvin Candie a ruthless plantation
> owner.”
>
> >>> (MBS) As plot summary, this is incompetent.


> . . . set-up, a pretext. The real text, the underlying message was the
> punchline that Blacks in slavery were fools and cowards.
>
> >>>> (MBS) ditto

. . .

Where I saw the film, at the AMC theater, in Emeryville California, the
> audience was the same one that had voted for Obama. When I waited in the
> long line to see the film,  people’s faces were glowing with
> expectation. The hype about Jamie Foxx and Sam Jackson and Kerry
> Washington was like voting for a Black man for President.
>
> >>> (MBS) Audience in my theater -- mixed audience -- loved the film,
applauded when it ended.

. . .  Would a Jewish American
> audience tolerate a film that makes fun of their history and their
> holocaust?


>>> (MBS) N.B. Mel Brooks, also Tarentino's "Inglorious Basterds."

Somebody ought to write diatribes against 'Hollywood,' but there have to be
better ones than this.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to