On Jan 12, 2013, at 1:06 PM, Robert Naiman wrote: > No, I do not claim to have worked on the issue of personnel selection > for 3 decades...
The issue you were referring to was, in your own words, "the fight over the Hagel nomination." Now you shift shape and refer to Palestine as if your "work" has done anything to help Palestine. During the time you were working to influence US policy that policy has moved from Republican James Baker and "evenhandedness" to Democrat Obama and total US support to the "Jewish State." In those terms your failure is more than total. > > On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Shane Mage <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> On Jan 12, 2013, at 12:44 PM, Robert Naiman wrote: >> >> >> For example, all other things being equal, my opinion should have >> more >> weight on the question of the political impact of the fight over the >> Hagel nomination than the opinion of Jim Devine, because I have >> worked >> on these issues since 1983, and Jim Devine has not. >> >> >> How typical of American politics. A record of total failure >> becomes a >> certificate of experience and knowledge. Robert claims to have >> worked on >> "these issues" (of which personnel to include in a criminal >> government) for >> three decades. And what has he to show for it? Obama's choice to >> head his >> Vietnam War celebration committee. How can failure be more total? >> >> >> >> >> Shane Mage >> >> "scientific discovery is basically recognition of obvious realities >> that self-interest or ideology have kept everybody from paying >> attention to" _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
