This liberal and radical doesn't see the import of the distinction you're
trying to make. Bringing the realists back in from the cold could indeed
represent a bold new departure in Mideast policy by the administration. The
realists want to have detente with Iran. That could be a very big deal.

On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Marv Gandall <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On 2013-01-12, at 11:47 AM, Jim Devine wrote:
>
> > it looks to me like Obama chose Hagel so that he could easily get
> > dronemeister/torture fan Brennan in to run the CIA. Hagel gets all the
> > flack.
>
> Perhaps, but I think there may be wider considerations at play - although
> not the kind perceived by some hopeful liberals and radicals, ie. that the
> nomination signals a bold new departure in Mideast policy by the
> administration.
>
> Instead, I think Obama chose Hegel because, like Gates before him, Hegel
> is representative of the previously dominant, but now disaffected, faction
> of the Republican party which broke with doctrinaire conservative
> Republican right over Iraq. They correctly perceived the unilateral use of
> US ground forces under Bush as a reckless adventure, and continue to favour
> multilateral intervention relying on sanctions, the use of air power, and
> the internal subversion of regimes opposed to US imperialism. In this
> sense, far from being a maverick, Hagel's "realist" views place him
> squarely within the bipartisan military and foreign policy establishment
> whose best-known public spokesmen have been the Republican Brent Scowcroft
> and the Democrat Zbigniew Brzezinski.
>
> The administration concurs with this bipartisan military and foreign
> policy consensus.On the domestic front, Obama and the Democrats have also
> since 2008 been trying to peel off discouraged "moderate" Republicans like
> Hagel, Scowcroft, Powell, etc. from the GOP by naming them to the Cabinet
> and moving into their political space. The administration meanwhile takes
> its liberal base for granted because it knows that, while it complains, it
> has nowhere else to go.
>
> Here's Scowcroft on Hagel:
>
> Scowcroft weighs in on the Hagel nomination
> By Josh Rogin
> Foreign Policy
> January 9, 2013
>
> Republican foreign-policy realists haven't changed their tune over the
> years, but some in the GOP have moved away from the realists, such as
> defense secretary nominee Chuck Hagel, according to former national
> security advisor Brent Scowcroft.
>
> "We haven't moved; the Republican party has moved," Scowcroft told The
> Cable in an interview. "I have been a lifelong Republican and I hold to
> what I are my own beliefs, which happen to be core Republican beliefs, but
> many in the party have taken a different course."
>
> Scowcroft is one of several senior former GOP officials, including
> Secretary of State Colin Powell, to back the Hagel nomination in the face
> of opposition from half a dozen GOP senators and groups associated with the
> neoconservative and hawkish sides of the Republican foreign policy
> community. Scowcroft said the GOP is rooted in the realist principles he
> still espouses.
>
> "The neocons go clear back to the 1970s. They were Democrats, then became
> sort of Republicans," he said. "I'm who I am. Whether the party wants to
> desert me, that's their privilege."
>
> Hagel's controversial comments from years past, such as when he once
> referred to the "Jewish lobby" or his longstanding opposition to unilateral
> sanctions, shouldn't bar him from serving as defense secretary, according
> to Scowcroft.
>
> "He is first and foremost an American and he takes an American perspective
> on everything he discusses," he said. "I'm frankly surprised [by the
> controversy], because he says what he believes at the time and there is a
> core in what he has said that makes some sense. Would you rather have
> someone who has never said anything?"
>
> Scowcroft joined with several other former officials in both parties to
> sign a letter in support of Hagel las month on the letterhead of the
> "Bipartisan Group," a loose association of former officials that includes
> Hagel. The Cable reported that horse racing gambler Bill Benter paid to
> have that letter advertised in Politico's Playbook newsletter.
>
> But the Bipartisan Group has no further plans to act on behalf of Hagel
> and is not working directly with the Obama administration on the Hagel
> defense effort.
>
> "This is a group that got together to write a letter to the president in
> 2008 about the Palestinian peace process and then got together again to
> write this letter," said Scowcroft. "There's no organization, there's no
> strategy, there's no nothing as far as I am concerned. It was a one-off
> thing. That's the whole story as far as I know."
>
> Scowcroft said it was "strong and brave" of President Barack Obama to
> choose a Republican such as Hagel, but he does not think this necessarily
> means Obama is cementing a foreign policy legacy that tracks with the
> Republican realist view of the world.
>
> "The president on foreign policy is fairly eclectic,' he said. "It's a
> promising move. Whether it represents anything broader than that, I'm not
> prepared to say."
>
>
> http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2013/01/09/scowcroft_the_gop_left_me_and_hagel?wp_login_redirect=0
> _______________________________________________
> pen-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
>



-- 
Robert Naiman
Policy Director
Just Foreign Policy
www.justforeignpolicy.org
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to