(Starting with Africa's most subtly-unpatriotic globo-journalist, here's the latest big biz and diplomat hype for**the*Durban 2013* economic carve-up of Africa - i.e. what will no doubt one day be seen as the BRICS equivalent of**the *Berlin 1885 *colonial political carving - starting predictably enough with a financial knife: "a Brics Development Bank with starting capital of up to $50bn". What with anti-imperialist Hugo Chavez in the sick bay, it's a ripe time for the subimperial bloc to finally sabotage the Bank of the South once and for all, something the Brazilians have become expert at. The contribution from Pretoria, as ever, is teaching the others a blunt /talk left to walk right /dance, e.g. BRICS as "counterpoint to the domination of global affairs by the G8" - when actually the main thrust here in Durban on March 26-27 will be acknowledging some slightly more efficient deputy-sheriff functions for the neoliberal G8 sheriffs, especially in looting Africa's resources.)

www.iol.co.za
/The Mercury/


 We need Brics -- and the G8 too

January 18 2013 at 12:21pm
By Peter Fabricius

------------------------------------------------------------------------

The BRics summit which South Africa will host in Durban at the end of March is going to be quite an event, with eight African heads of state invited to confer with the heads of the five Brics countries -- Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa -- and a host of other ancillary events.

Jerry Matjila, director-general of International Relations and Co-operation, and Anil Sooklal, deputy director-general for the Middle East and Asia in the same department -- respectively the "sherpa" and "sous-sherpa"(deputy sherpa) for the summit -- briefed media about the summit this week.

The "outreach" to the African leaders is part of South Africa's aim to push Brics towards Africa. It is also hoping a Brics Development Bank -- with initial capital of $50 billion (R438.5bn) -- might be launched at the summit, which would greatly help Africa.

South Africa had three main aims when it joined Brics in 2010 -- to advance the national interest, to advance its African agenda and to re-balance the imbalance of global political and economic power, now tilted towards the West (aka the North).

When it comes to advancing the national interest, many observers are rather sceptical, pointing out that the Brics countries remain protectionist and so South Africa's trade with them is still largely -- and ironically -- more "colonial" than its trade with the former colonial powers of Europe or with the US.

South Africa's trade with the US and European Union is now fairly balanced, with a large proportion of our exports being finished goods, whereas we are still exporting mainly raw materials to the Brics countries and importing mainly manufactures.

That hardly contributes to the government's economic strategy of adding greater value to our minerals and other commodities, to boost export revenue and create new jobs.

But government officials countered at the briefing that South Africa is effectively using its improved relations with the Brics countries -- China especially -- to change those "unsustainable" trade relationships.

One official said that our trade deficit with China, for example, had narrowed from R48bn in 2008 to less than R18bn in 2011 and had essentially been wiped out in 2012, though precise figures were not yet in.

He attributed this to lobbying from Pretoria to Beijing.

In response China had invited South Africa last year to give it a list of 40 export products which it agreed to import duty-free.

The two governments agreed this should include R10bn worth of wine and R15bn worth of beef, for instance.

The problem was that South Africa was unable to produce that much wine and beef.

The further response of China to such supply constraints was to offer to invest more in agro-processing and other production in South Africa to add value before export, such as a steel smelter to process our iron ore.

Peter Draper, head of trade research at the SA Institute of International Affairs, was rather sceptical about this account, noting, for example, that most of the recent narrowing of the trade gap with China had been because of increased exports of iron ore, not finished goods, from South Africa.

Nonetheless, if Brics provides South Africa with another political platform to try to address such economic issues, that can only be a good thing.

The trick is to use Brics to such advantage without jeopardising other at least equally important relationships. South Africa seems to be slightly ambivalent on that score.

At one point in the briefing a senior official stressed the competitive character of relations between Brics and the West, describing Brics as "a counterpoint to the domination of global affairs by the G8..."

Yet at another point he stressed complementariness instead, calling Brics "a new global template and caucus, overriding previous East-West and North-South constructs and divisions".

Brics is not a magic cure for all our political and economic ills, as some very senior government officials seem to believe.

We need all the help we can get. Perhaps we should add an "outreach" to the G8 to the summit agenda?


***

/Business Day/


   Durban may see founding of Brics bank

by Nick Kotch <http://www.bdlive.co.za/world/africa/2012/08/06/nick-kotch-profile>, 16 January 2013

HANDS ON: Department of International Relations and Co-operation director general Jerry Matjila has worked hard preparing for the summit. Picture: GCIS


   Related articles

 * Development bank, business council on agenda for Brics summit in SA
   
<http://www.bdlive.co.za/national/2013/01/15/development-bank-business-council-on-agenda-for-brics-summit-in-sa>


SOUTH African officials say plans for a Brics Development Bank with starting capital of up to $50bn are gathering pace ahead of the group's summit in Durban in two months.

"There is the political will from all the Brics countries to have this bank," South African ambassador to Brics Anil Sooklal said in Pretoria on Tuesday.

SA is lobbying to host the bank, if it gets off the ground, emphasising the sophistication and integrity of the financial services industry here. The country co-chaired the preparatory work with India.

Supporters of the idea of the bank have worked on the basis that each of the five Brics countries --- the others are Brazil, China and Russia --- will commit $10bn at the outset. Its objectives will include financing projects in poor and developing nations, particularly in Africa and India.

"We all found comfort with that ($50bn) figure but there is nothing official about it," said Dr Sooklal, a deputy director-general at the Department of International Relations and Co-operation. "The leaders will decide."

South African Institute of International Affairs (SAIIA) senior research fellow Peter Draper said it was still uncertain what decision, if any, about a Brics bank would be taken in Durban on March 26-27.

"This is quite a closely guarded secret and you have to decide what it is that the various states want.

"My take is that SA, China and India all see potential in the idea --- but from different perspectives."

Russia and Brazil were much less enthusiastic, the former because its trade and investment focus was on the East, and the latter because it already had access to vast development funds.

Dr Sooklal and department director-general Jerry Matjila have done most of the heavy lifting to prepare the Durban summit. About 3,000 delegates and officials are expected to attend, as well as the presidents or prime ministers of all five countries.

Dr Sooklal said the event budget had been about R20m, but had increased after a decision to involve African regional economic communities and the African Union in the summit. SA is often accused of acting in its own interests while purporting to promote those of Africa as a whole.

Apart from the development bank and African economic issues, the other summit goals are to set up a Brics Business Council and a think-tank, harnessing the intellectual and research capacity of the members.

The theme of the summit is: Brics and Africa: Partnership for Development, Integration and Industrialisation.

SA will chair the Brics group for 12 months after Durban, and then hand over to Brazil.

Brics controls 25% of the global gross domestic product, 30% of the world's land and 43% of its population.

The implicit notion that SA's historic economies ties with Europe are on the wane were challenged more than once last year. The European Commission said its 25 member states were jointly by far SA's largest investors and trade partners.


_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to