Prison for the Man With the Megaphone

Dresden Court Passes a Harsh Sentence Against Participant in Anti-Nazi Protest 
of 2011

An alleged “ringleader” of protests against a Nazi march on February 19th, 2011 
in Dresden was sentenced by a local court to a prison sentence of 22 months.

Report by Hendrik Lasch for the newspaper Neues Deutschland

“At some point, the population of Dresden is sick of it all” – with this 
opinion, district judge Hans-Joachim Hlava justified his harsh sentence against 
a participant in an Anti-Nazi protest on February 19th, 2011 in the capital of 
the German state of Saxony.  The 36-year-old family father was sentenced to a 
prison sentence of 22 months without probation.  His attorney Sven Richwin 
regards an appeal as likely: he had no hope “ in the first level of 
jurisdiction anyway.” 

The skilled industrial mechanic was charged with coordinating and commanding a 
forced breach of a police barricade in Dresden's Südvorstadt district as a 
“ringleader.”  Rocks were alleged to have been thrown, and police were 
allegedly attacked with rods.  In 2011, the police had attemped to separate the 
right-wing extremists from the counter-demonstration on both sides of the Elbe 
River, but were not numerically up to the task.  The coalition “Dresden 
Nazifrei” in turn had called for a blockade of the Nazi march, which 
presupposed a “permeation” of police lines.  The central principle of the 
“action consensus” was non-violence, however.  This wasn't always followed: 
south of the main train station there were hefty skirmishes.  In one case, 
hundreds of protestors confronted 14 police officers.  While the barricade was 
stormed, some officers were injured.  There were injuries from fireworks, 
lacerations, and bruises.

Whether or not the accused played a role that day, and if so, what kind, is an 
open question.  One witness was not able to identify him in court.  The state's 
attorney referred to a police video.  In the video, a man of the same height as 
the accused could be seen.  The action “exhibited great criminal energy” 
according to the state's attorney.  The charge was severe disturbance of the 
public peace, grievous bodily injury, and libel.  The state's attorney even 
demanded a two-and-a-half year sentence.  The defence, on the other hand, did 
not regard it as proven that the accused really even was the man in the video.  
The defence also stated that the charge should have been at most simple 
disturbance of the public peace, and that his client could not be held 
responsible for the injuries to police officers.

Judge Hlava is of a different opinion:  “you must also take responsibility for 
the deeds of others”, he said to the accused during sentencing.  He also 
accused him of not stating and explaining “your position on violence” to the 
court.  Futhermore, he also nebulously stated that the “political vita” of the 
36-year-old shows “that you were there.”  The judge made no effort to conceal 
that the sentence was also intended as a deterrent from the upcoming 
counter-demonstration against the Nazi march on February 13th.  The historical 
date attracts right-wingers and “automatically also the left” and would be 
“politically exploited by both sides.”  Residents of the city, the judge 
claimed, were sick of it.

Defense attorney Sven Richwin regards the sentence as excessive in comparison 
with similar cases, for example around the 1st of May demonstrations in Berlin: 
“it is beyond the pale”, he stated in response to an ND query.  It is simply 
not comprehensible why the sentence was not at least probationary.  The 
36-year-old is the father of one child, and has a full-time job working for the 
executive board of the party Die Linke.  One of the curiosities of the trial 
was that a representative of his employer was questioned as a witness before 
the court, even though the accused did not start working there until after 
February of 2011.  Richwin is now placing his hopes in the appeal.  Whereas the 
Dresden district court has become known for its harsh judgements against 
participants in blockades and other protests, other courts have sometimes at 
least ameliorated sentences.


_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to