New York TIMES opinion / March 16, 2013

>> A Profession With an Egalitarian Core
By TYLER COWEN

ECONOMICS is sometimes associated with the study and defense of
selfishness and material inequality, but it has an egalitarian and
civil libertarian core that should be celebrated. And that core may
guide us in some surprising directions.

Economic analysis is itself value-free, but in practice it encourages
a cosmopolitan interest in natural equality. Many economic models, of
course, assume that all individuals are motivated by rational
self-interest or some variant thereof; even the so-called behavioral
theories tweak only the fringes of a basically common, rational
understanding of people. The crucial implication is this: If you treat
all individuals as fundamentally the same in your theoretical
constructs, it would be odd to insist that the law should suddenly
start treating them differently. << more at
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/17/business/the-egalitarian-tradition-of-economics.html

Economic analysis is value-free, but has good values??? And Cowen
assumes that there's only one perspective in economics?

In any event, the money libertarianism that Cowen advocates _does_
treat all people as equal. Even when there are extremely large
differences in wealth and power. As Anatole France wrote, "The law, in
its majestic equality, forbids the rich and the poor alike to sleep
under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread." Similarly,
Cowen's economics sees each individual as equally likely to sleep
under bridges, beg in the streets, and to steal bread, except that
some people choose not to do so. These are the entrepreneurs, the
secular saints of Cowen's economics. (Or are they truly "secular" in
that this faith worships the Invisible Hand?)
-- 
Jim Devine /  "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your
own way and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to