he will be missed.
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Richard Wolff <[email protected]> wrote:

> Stephen A. Resnick was a leading
>
> American Marxian economist for
>
> over four decades—from the 1960s,
>
> when the struggle against the Vietnam
>
> War brought him to Marxism, until his
>
> death this January. His parents were
>
> Boston retail-trade workers whose son
>
> showed exceptional aptitude for reading
>
> and thinking. That took him to the
>
> Wharton School at Pennsylvania and on
>
> to MIT for his economics Ph.D., studying
>
> in the 1960s with future Nobel laureates
>
> Paul Samuelson and Robert Solow. His
>
> first job out of graduate school was as
>
> an assistant professor at Yale, where I
>
> met him as a grad student in his class.
>
> Steve was thus launched on the pampered
>
> elite track for docile exponents of
>
> mainstream economics, at that time a
>
> tense “synthesis” of neoclassical microeconomics
>
> and Keynesian macro.
>
> Young people from below, myself included,
>
> were allowed—a few at a
>
> time—onto such tracks.
>
> How troubling to the profession,
>
> then, when so many of us left that mainstream,
>
> having found it polluted by its
>
> uncritical subservience to the capitalist
>
> status quo. Many of us formed the
>
> Union for Radical Political Economics
>
> (URPE) to break from the mainstream
>
> American Economics Association (AEA).
>
> Some of us engaged the most serious
>
> and best-developed of the alternatives
>
> to both neoclassical and Keynesian economic
>
> paradigms: Marxism. Steve thus
>
> redirected his twin passions of economic
>
> theory and econometrics toward the
>
> goals of social change and mastery of
>
> Marxian economics.
>
> Yale responded to this shift predictably—
>
> by blocking Steve’s promotion
>
> beyond associate professor. So, in
>
> 1971, he joined me at the City College
>
> of New York. Its new chairman, Alf
>
> Conrad, recently decamped from the
>
> Harvard Business School, was building
>
> a strong Marxian section of the economics
>
> department. There we taught
>
> the first semesters of “open admissions,”
>
> that wonderful moment when
>
> New York’s children all became eligible
>
> for a free college education: testimony
>
> to New York’s working-class struggles
>
> and victories.
>
> But then UMass-Amherst made
>
> Steve and me (and Sam Bowles, Herb
>
> Gintis, and Rick Edwards) an offer we
>
> could not refuse. We all took positions
>
> there in 1973. Steve and I focused
>
> on developing a Marxian component
>
> of the curriculum, both
>
> undergraduate and graduate. From
>
> the mid-1970s to 2010, Marxian economics
>
> was a major concentration
>
> available to interested students from
>
> the United States and around the
>
> world. What UMass achieved then
>
> was a key contribution to this striking
>
> result: more Marxian economists
>
> are teaching in U.S. colleges and universities
>
> today than ever before.
>
> Thanks especially to Steve, much of
>
> that Marxian economics was freed from
>
> mechanical, formulaic interpretations
>
> that reflected the exigencies of Soviet
>
> economic development and foreign
>
> policy, and the pressures and legacies
>
> of Cold War polarizations. Likewise,
>
> Steve took the lead in interrogating
>
> major modern theoretical breakthroughs
>
> (such as structuralism,
>
> semiotics, post-structuralism, and postmodernism)
>
> to see how their insights
>
> could enrich Marxian economics.
>
> Most of Steve’s work was devoted
>
> to collaborations with me on Marxian
>
> theory. Our first major book, Knowledge
>
> and Class: A Marxian Critique of Political
>
> Economy, was published by the
>
> University of Chicago Press in 1987, over
>
> Milton Friedman’s objection. It established
>
> a different interpretation of Marx’s
>
> concepts of class and of causality (newly
>
> renamed “overdetermination,” a term
>
> taken from Sigmund Freud and the
>
> Marxian philosophers György Lukács
>
> and Louis Althusser). In our many books
>
> and articles over the years, we developed
>
> these concepts into a genuinely
>
> new Marxian economics.
>
> The last year of Steve’s life, 2012, saw
>
> the publication of our Contending
>
> Economic Theories: Neoclassical,
>
> Keynesian and Marxian by the MIT Press.
>
> The book is a summary of what divides
>
> the economics profession and an exploration
>
> of the high stakes of that division.
>
> It is also a tool for passing on, to a
>
> new generation, the excitement and
>
> political power that flow from a key
>
> realization: that economics always was,
>
> is, and will be a contested terrain of differing
>
> perspectives connected to clashing
>
> political agendas.
>
> Last year, Steve and I noted, with a
>
> certain ironic satisfaction, that capitalism’s
>
> worst crisis since the 1930s has
>
> turned a new generation of young people
>
> toward the criticism of capitalism
>
> and thereby the discovery of Marxism.
>
> What they are now learning owes a great
>
> deal to the superb mind and passionate
>
> commitment of Steve Resnick. D&S
>
> RICK WOLFF is a visiting professor in
>
> the Graduate Program of International
>
> Affairs at New School University.
>
> Steve directed his
>
> twin passions of
>
> economic theory and
>
> econometrics toward
>
> the goals of social
>
> change and mastery of
>
> Marxian economics.
>




-- 
Jim Devine /  "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your own way
and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to