Tom wrote:

> According to Wikipedia, which cites Parker, Walter C. (v86 n5 p344 Jan
> 2005). "Teaching Against Idiocy", Bloomington: Phi Delta Kappan: "An idiot
> in Athenian democracy was someone who was characterized by self-centeredness
> and concerned almost exclusively with private — as opposed to public —
> affairs." Mankiw epitomizes this definition of "idiot."

I may have already posted, but I had a teacher at the University of
Havana who distinguished between "smart" and "intelligent."  This is
how I'd paraphrase him now: Intelligent, from intus = inside and
legere = to read.  To read inside, you need to have the heart in the
right place (short hand for conducive onto-sociological,
epistemological, and ethical conditions). So you can be very smart,
but not necessarily intelligent.  You can be very smart and yet a
total idiot.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to