Actually, I had no more than sent that post when I began to see the focus;"
MMT" had confused me for a bit & I had failed to focus on the core.

I agree completely,. In fact, there is a principle here that, I think, is of
great importance, though I've never found a really satisfactory expression
of it: roughly,  "X is not a proper demand, because if we had the power to
win X, we would have the power to overthrow capitalism." And sometimes X can
be trivial in itself, but still unachievable under capitalism.

Carrol

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:pen-l-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Doug Henwood
> Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 10:22 AM
> To: Progressive Economics
> Subject: Re: [Pen-l] monetary policy
> 
> 
> On Jun 21, 2013, at 11:08 AM, Marv Gandall <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
> >  They think the policy and decision making elites just don't "get" how
the
> modern monetary system based on fiat currencies works, and they're on an
> educating mission.
> 
> That's one of the things about this that gets me - the bourgeoisie knows
> damn well how the system works. They just have different political
priorities
> from the printing press crowd. It's not a matter of understanding - it's a
> matter of interests.
> 
> Carrol, what I meant was that if the bourgeoisie were so weakened that it
> could accept unlimited central bank financing of budget deficits, 0%
interest
> rates, and full employment, the political environment would be so
different
> from the present one that we could be contemplating a whole different
> agenda - i.e., socialism of some sort. So if you're imagining that sort of
> political environment, why limit your imagination to monetary
manipulations
> and leave questions of ownership and power out of the picture?
> 
> 
> Doug
> _______________________________________________
> pen-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l


_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to