On Sun, 7 Jul 2013 17:20:13 -0500 "Carrol Cox" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Michael Smith > > Not at all, thank God; it would be distinctly 'regressive'. But it > > would be a very good thing. The less people believe the official > > story, the better. It hardly matters what they do believe, as long > > as they don't believe the Times. > > This is not true. Conspiracists regularly disrupt and sabotage > efforts at resistance to the government. Naïve believers in the NYTT > can change; conspiracists can't. Oh, okay. A *slight* overstatement. But I must say that handwringing about conspiracists strikes me as evidence of what is, fundamentally, a mere-liberal anxiety. Or would do, in anybody other than Carrol. -- [email protected] http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org Unexpected Bedfellows dept. : L'athéisme est immoral et aristocratique; l'idée de l'être suprême, et de l'immortalité de l'âme, est un rappel continuel à la justice; elle est donc sociale et républicaine. -- Robespierre, contra Dawkins et epigg. _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
