On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Robert Naiman <[email protected]
> wrote:

>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Duncan Meisel - 350.org <[email protected]>
> Date: Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:35 PM
> Subject: President Obama is talking about rejecting Keystone XL
> To: Robert Naiman <[email protected]>
>
>
>  Friends,
>
> *In the past week, President Obama has delivered some straight talk on
> Keystone XL:*
>
> "I meant what I said; I'm going to evaluate this based on whether or not
> this is going to significantly contribute to carbon in our atmosphere."
>
> "That oil is going to be piped down to the Gulf to be sold on the world
> oil markets, so it does not bring down gas prices here in the United
> States."
>
> "Putting all your eggs in the basket of an oil pipeline that may only
> create about 50 permanent jobs ... isn’t a jobs plan."
>
>
Well it is good rhetoric. And it does represent a change in rhetoric. So
you are absolutely right to forward a quote saying this is a response to
pressure by a lot of people doing a lot of good work. (And you are one of
those people).  Just a reminder, not so much to you as to anyone reading
this. Rhetoric is not necessarily reality, and we need to keep the pressure
up. Also David Roberts, who is a long-time Obama enthusiast, and has some
skill in Obama parsing fears that what this really means is that Obama
intends to approve the pipeline, but do some equivalent of offsets - get
some concessions in return for doing so.



> Wow.
>
> These comments are the result of years of relentless organizing by folks
> across the country (and the world) to put pressure on the President. More
> than 1400 people have been arrested, including some last week, and tens of
> thousands more have taken to the streets in protests against the pipeline.
>
> *In fact, since March, President Obama and his closest advisers have been
> met by #noKXL protests at 30 different events -- from Washington, DC to
> Warrensburg, Missouri to Cape Town, South Africa.* Each time the message
> is simple: keeping your promises on climate change means standing up to the
> tar sands and stopping Keystone XL.
>
> *To see updates from all the Rapid Response Team events, you can click
> here: 
> organizing-for-our-future.tumblr.com<http://act.350.org/go/3530?t=1&akid=3409.572422.7_YWyA>--
>  these folks deserve thanks for bringing the message right to the
> President and his team.*
>
> **
>
> And it looks like the message might be getting through. While he is still
> giving himself some wiggle room to approve the pipeline (and Big Oil
> continues to beat their chest and insist it *will* be approved), there is
> far, far less wiggle room now than there was even a week or two ago.* If
> he's at all honest about his climate test, there is no way he can approve
> the pipeline.*
>
> *Every independent analysis of the pipeline -- unlike the State
> Department's big oil-tainted assessment -- has reached the obvious
> conclusion that building an 830,000 barrel per day pipeline carrying the
> world's dirtiest oil will be bad for the climate.* Even if Canada said
> they wanted to clean up their mess, it wouldn't be enough: the government
> of Alberta enforces its environmental laws less than 1% of the time,
> meaning that the only climate-safe tar sands is the stuff that stays in the
> ground.
>
> When I first read President Obama's statements about Keystone in his
> climate address last month, I didn't know what to think. On the one hand,
> nothing changed: he gave himself room to OK the pipeline, and we need to
> keep pushing. But on the other, it's stunning progress. **
>
> *President Obama is talking openly about rejecting Keystone XL. Two years
> ago, no one thought that could happen, and it only is because we pushed,
> and continue to push.*
>
> Next week Bill McKibben and the rest of the 350.org Keystone team will be
> in touch with ideas for the next leg of this fight -- but for now, I think
> it's worth just appreciating how far we've come. We've had plenty of
> setbacks -- such as the fast-tracking of the Southern segment of the
> pipeline -- but together we're showing how to fight, and maybe, possibly,
> against hope, win something big.
>
> Let's keep going,
>
> Duncan
>
> P.S. There will be a full report back from the Summer Heat wave of mass
> actions against fossil fuels coming next week after all the actions wrap
> up, but for now I'll let the pictures do the talking. All this happened
> last weekend in (from top left) Massachusetts, the Columbia River, Ohio,
> Utah and Washington DC:
>
> <http://act.350.org/go/3531?t=2&akid=3409.572422.7_YWyA>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
> 350.org is building a global movement to solve the climate crisis.
> Connect with us on Facebook <http://facebook.com/350.org> and 
> Twitter<http://twitter.com/350>,
> and sign up for email alerts<http://350.org/signup?akid=3409.572422.7_YWyA>.
> You can help power our work by getting involved locally, sharing your
> story <http://local.350.org/stories/?akid=3409.572422.7_YWyA>, and donating
> here. <http://350.org/donate?akid=3409.572422.7_YWyA>  *
>
> To stop receiving emails from 350.org, click 
> here.<http://act.350.org/cms/unsubscribe/unsubscribe/?t=3&akid=3409.572422.7_YWyA>
> *
>
>
>
> --
> Robert Naiman
> Policy Director
> Just Foreign Policy
> www.justforeignpolicy.org
> [email protected]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pen-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
>
>


-- 
Facebook: Gar Lipow  Twitter: GarLipow
Solving the Climate Crisis web page: SolvingTheClimateCrisis.com
Grist Blog: http://grist.org/author/gar-lipow/
Online technical reference: http://www.nohairshirts.com
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to