in addition, a movement could be totally atomized. For example, Ms. Thatcher's technocrats found that public housing encouraged class consciousness and so tried to abolish it.
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 11:00 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > "c b" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Is there a point at which a “movement” actually hits bottom? > > A movement's objectives could be met and the movement would > not be needed anymore or the mainstream could adopt the ideas. > > There could be complete repression. > > The movement could have an erroneous basis. > > Factionalism can bring a movement to a halt. > > A movement's leaders can be bought off. > > -- > Ron > > > _______________________________________________ > pen-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l > > -- Jim Devine / "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." -- Philip K. Dick
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
