MIT Technology Review
Postol vs. the Pentagon
By Gary Taubes on April 1, 2002

Ted Postol is challenging the government’s claims about a proposed a 
missile defense system. He’s a prickly character, but he has a track 
record that’s hard to beat.

It is conceivable, as one of his colleagues has suggested, that Theodore 
Postol could be more effective “if he did not eventually accuse just 
about everybody of fraud or malfeasance or stupidity.” Over the past two 
years, for instance, the MIT professor of science, technology and 
national security policy has publicly accused the defense technology 
corporation TRW of perpetrating a hoax on the U.S. government. He has 
charged the Pentagon’s Missile Defense Agency (formerly known as the 
Ballistic Missile Defense Organization) with committing an “elaborate 
scientific and technical blunder,” compounded by fraud and misconduct. 
He has charged the authors of a report investigating those alleged 
frauds-who include two staff scientists at MIT’s Lincoln Laboratory-with 
committing scientific fraud themselves to cover up the frauds they were 
allegedly investigating. He has charged the Pentagon’s Defense Security 
Service, in a letter to John Podesta, who was then President Clinton’s 
chief of staff, with “Soviet thuggish-style conduct.” And he has even 
accused MIT president Charles M. Vest of doing little or nothing to 
clarify the matter or investigate.

This steady stream of indignation and accusation has led Postol’s 
colleagues to describe him as not so much interested in building 
coalitions or playing politics as he is in pursuing the truth with a 
single-minded, laserlike focus. They also suggest that his passion and 
his capacity for outrage constitute his best and worst qualities. His 
volatility leads him into conflicts that detract from his main point, 
which happens to be one of extraordinary importance. Postol is asserting 
that the U.S. government is on the verge of deploying a $60 billion 
missile defense system that cannot possibly work-a move that would make 
the world a considerably less secure place to live.

http://www.technologyreview.com/featuredstory/401412/postol-vs-the-pentagon/

========

September 4, 2013
Rockets in Syrian Attack Carried Large Payload of Gas, Experts Say
By WILLIAM J. BROAD

A new study of images apparently from the Syrian attack last month 
concludes that the rockets delivering toxic sarin gas to neighborhoods 
around Damascus held up to 50 times more nerve agent than previously 
estimated, a conclusion that could solve the mystery of why there were 
so many more victims than in previous chemical attacks.

The study, by leading weapons experts, also strongly suggests that the 
mass of toxic material could have come only from a large stockpile. 
American, British and French officials have charged that only the Syrian 
government and not the rebels was in position to make such large 
quantities of deadly toxins.

Secretary of State John Kerry told Congress, in hearings on Tuesday and 
Wednesday, that the United States believes the Syrian military was 
responsible for the attack, and in classified briefings officials have 
pointed to Unit 450, which controls Syrian chemical weapons.

The new study was conducted by Richard M. Lloyd, an expert in warhead 
design, and Theodore A. Postol, a physicist at the Massachusetts 
Institute of Technology. They based their investigation on scores of 
online videos and photographs posted since the Aug. 21 attack sent 
thousands of sick and dying Syrians to hospitals in the Damascus suburbs.

In interviews and reports, the two weapons specialists said their 
analysis of rocket parts and wreckage posted online suggested that the 
warheads carried toxic payloads of about 50 liters (13 gallons), not the 
one or two liters (up to half a gallon) of nerve agent that some weapons 
experts had previously estimated.

“It’s a clever design,” Dr. Postol said of the munitions in an 
interview. “It’s clever not only in how it was implemented but in the 
effectiveness of its dispersal. It accounts for the large number of 
causalities.”

full: 
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/05/world/middleeast/rockets-in-syrian-attack-carried-large-payload-of-gas-experts-say.html
 

_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to