"Is "slightly moderating inequality" really in everyone's interest? If so, how come this idea is not very popular among the wealthy?"
I really know nothing about Di Blasio, nor the outlook of NYC's top bourgeoisie. I posted this only because it's not the kind of political analysis I'm used to from the New York Times, let alone from a bourgeois economist. Even though, hey, when you think about it, "The Democrats: Slightly Moderating Inequality Since 1932" could sum up the party on a T-shirt. "Also since de Blasio's program is in everyone'e interest including the elite, all True Progressives should oppose the guy, right? Because of course, with the biracial family and all, he will clearly be the More Effective Evil!" Bait. I'm not biting. On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 6:38 AM, raghu <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 1:13 AM, socialismorbarbarism < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> In the end, by the way, de Blasio will probably be accepted by the 1 >> percent, since his program will end up being seen as essentially one of >> slightly moderating inequality in everyone’s interest. >> >> And that's according to Paul "Feelin' Feisty" Krugman: >> >> >> http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/09/16/the-political-economy-of-bloombergism/ >> > > > Is "slightly moderating inequality" really in everyone's interest? If so, > how come this idea is not very popular among the wealthy? > > Also since de Blasio's program is in everyone'e interest including the > elite, all True Progressives should oppose the guy, right? Because of > course, with the biracial family and all, he will clearly be the More > Effective Evil! > > -raghu. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > pen-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l > >
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
