"evidence suggests the last sentence about it being stupidity is wrong"

Meaning it's cupidity, not stupidity?


On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Gar Lipow <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Eugene Coyle <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Germany has an ambitious plan to switch from nuclear to solar and wind.
>>  It is running into problems, for businesses and residences alike.
>>
>> Gene
>>
>>
>> http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/19/world/europe/germanys-effort-at-clean-energy-proves-complex.html?pagewanted=all
>
>
> And a comment in that link explains why very well, other than his/her own
> evidence suggests the last sentence about it being stupidity is wrong
>
> > jupi
>
>    - Hessen, Germany
>
> Sadly this article get's it all wrong. In fact there is no real government
> support for the shift to renewables. The smaller coalition partner, the
> FDP, is openly against it. Angela Merkels CDU isn't honest enough to say
> what it wants, including Angela Merkel herself.
> One has to remember, that the present government inherited the plans for
> renewables from the former government, including plans to shut down all
> nuclear plants. The switching to solar began long before Merkel took over.
> Merkel worked hard to end all these plans - and nearly succeeded. It was
> the exit from the exit from nuclear energy, resulting in public uproar
> without end. An unprecedented debacle for Merkel .
>
> Then Fukushima happened and Merkel jumped on the chance to take a 180deg
> turn. She presented her own plan, that was basically a facade of the old
> one, minus solar energy. It was the exit from the exit from the exit from
> nuclear energy. So much for Angela Merkels commitment to renewables.
> As a result of her politics, installation of solar plants dropped by
> 50-60% within the year. Uncounted companies went bankrupt. The big players
> in electricity business are happy to build coal fired plant after coal
> fired plant, with the main goal to obstruct the switching to renewables -
> with the side effect of increased CO2 emissions, because the poor german
> coal produces more of it than gas, that would otherwise be used.
>
> I could go on indefinitely about the stupidity of this government.
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pen-l mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Facebook: Gar Lipow  Twitter: GarLipow
> Solving the Climate Crisis web page: SolvingTheClimateCrisis.com
> Grist Blog: http://grist.org/author/gar-lipow/
> Online technical reference: http://www.nohairshirts.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> pen-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
>
>


-- 
Cheers,

Tom Walker (Sandwichman)
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to