(Thanks to the shale gas boom, which some see as a bubble, including the head 
of Gazprom, quoted below. I posted an article last month from an industry 
publication which more fully outlines the position of the shale gas skeptics:  
http://oilprice.com/Energy/Natural-Gas/Has-the-Shale-Bubble-Already-Burst.html)

U.S. Is Overtaking Russia as Largest Oil-and-Gas Producer
By  RUSSELL GOLD and DANIEL GILBERT
Wall Street Journal
October 3 2013

The U.S. is overtaking Russia as the world's largest producer of oil and 
natural gas, a startling shift that is reshaping markets and eroding the clout 
of traditional energy-rich nations.

U.S. energy output has been surging in recent years, a comeback fueled by 
shale-rock formations of oil and natural gas that was unimaginable a decade 
ago. A Wall Street Journal analysis of global data shows that the U.S. is on 
track to pass Russia as the world's largest producer of oil and gas combined 
this year—if it hasn't already.

The U.S. ascendance comes as Russia has struggled to maintain its energy output 
and has yet to embrace technologies such as hydraulic fracturing that have 
boosted American reserves.

"This is a remarkable turn of events," said Adam Sieminski, head of the U.S. 
Energy Information Administration. "This is a new era of thinking about market 
conditions, and opportunities created by these conditions, that you wouldn't in 
a million years have dreamed about."

The U.S. produced the equivalent of about 22 million barrels a day of oil, 
natural gas and related fuels in July, according to figures from the EIA and 
the International Energy Agency. Neither agency has data for Russia's gas 
output this year, but Moscow's forecast for 2013 oil-and-gas production works 
out to about 21.8 million barrels a day.

U.S. imports of natural gas and crude oil have fallen 32% and 15%, 
respectively, in the past five years, narrowing the U.S. trade deficit. And 
since the U.S. is such a big consumer of energy, the shift to producing more of 
its own oil and gas has left substantial fuel supplies available for other 
buyers. Nations that rely on peddling petroleum for their economic strength and 
political clout face dwindling market power as a result. Oil prices so far 
remain high, however, closing Wednesday at $104.10 a barrel, up 18% from a year 
ago.

Many analyses of energy markets look only at crude oil. But Russia and the U.S. 
also are major players in natural-gas markets, where they far outproduce 
countries such as Saudi Arabia, the world's largest oil producer.

The U.S. last year tapped more natural gas than Russia for the first time since 
1982, according to data from the International Energy Agency. Russia's exports 
have been crimped by rising competition and the economic slump in Europe. 
Russia forecasts that its gas production will increase slightly in coming 
years, but its forecast for this year is below current U.S. production.

The U.S. is also catching up in the race to pump crude. Russia produced an 
average of 10.8 million barrels of oil and related fuel a day in the first half 
of this year. That was about 900,000 barrels a day more than the U.S.—but down 
from a gap of three million barrels a day a few years ago, according to the IEA.

The amount of crude from two of the hottest plays in the U.S.—the Bakken oil 
field in North Dakota and the Eagle Ford shale formation in South 
Texas—continues to rise rapidly, while Russian output has increased modestly 
over the past three years. The Russian government predicts oil output will 
remain flat through 2016, while natural gas ticks up 3%. The shift has raised 
concerns in Moscow that U.S. crude supplies will crowd out Russia's oil exports.

"Russia looks like the main loser in the global market," said Tatiana Mitrova, 
of the Russian Academy of Sciences' Energy Research Institute. More than 40% of 
Russia's budget comes from oil-and-gas related duties and taxes, she said.

The institute has forecast that Russian oil exports could fall 25% to 30% after 
2015, reducing gross domestic product more than $100 billion.

To be sure, Russia is believed to have one of the world's largest, untapped 
oil-bearing shale formations, creating the potential for a surge in production.

And not everyone in Russia sees a threat from the U.S. The head of one the 
country's largest energy companies, OAO Gazprom, has called expanding U.S. 
shale output "a bubble that will soon burst."

A similar view was expressed Tuesday by Abdallah Salem el-Badri, the head of 
the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, who said in an interview 
that the U.S. oil boom from shale will run out of steam by decade's end.

Saudi Arabia remains the world's largest supplier of crude oil and related 
liquids. As of July, Saudi Arabia was pumping 11.7 million barrels a day, 
according to the IEA. Russia was second, at 10.8 million barrels, while the 
U.S. was third, at 10.3 million. Each of the three pumps more than twice the 
daily output of such major producers as Canada, Venezuela and Nigeria.

Even optimists in the U.S. concede that the shale boom's longevity could hinge 
on commodity prices, government regulations and public support, the last of 
which could be problematic. A poll last month by the Pew Research Center for 
the People and the Press found that opposition to increased use of fracking 
rose to 49% from 38% in the previous six months.

Other risk factors: a global economic contraction would depress oil and gas 
prices, leading companies to slow production. And drilling in shale is 
expensive and more complex than conventional exploration, leading to concerns 
that a market downturn could take a large bite out of U.S. output.

So far, most companies aren't dialing back, even though they need access to 
enormous amounts of capital to pay for the deep wells required to tap dense 
rock formations.

Much of the growth in fossil-fuel production comes from companies that need to 
sell shares, take on debt or sell assets to plug a gap between spending and 
their revenue. According to an estimate by Barclays PLC, 50 major U.S. oil and 
gas explorers needed to raise $50.3 billion last year to close that gap.

Plenty of private-equity funding and overseas investment remains available, 
industry experts say, and debt remains relatively cheap.

"The dollars needed have never been larger," said Maynard Holt, co-president of 
Houston-based investment bank Tudor, Pickering Holt & Co. "But the money is 
truly out there. The global energy capital river is flowing our way."

U.S. energy producers also are drilling more efficiently and cutting costs in 
other ways. Some companies have said that the amount of oil and gas produced by 
shale wells isn't dropping as fast as predicted.

Ken Hersh, chief executive of NGP Energy Capital Management LLC, a 
private-equity fund with $13 billion under management, said the immense amounts 
of oil and gas uncovered in recent years indicate that the U.S. energy boom 
could last a long time.

"It is not a supply question anymore," he said. "It is about demand and the 
cost of production. Those are the two drivers."
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to