That's 45 years ago! What's that got to do with server farms, p
'power' plants, pipelines, hospital care and insurance bureaucracies now?

On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Perelman, Michael
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Gar, regarding your question, here is something from my Invisible Handcuffs.
>
>
>
> For example, based on a survey of sixty New England factories, Michael Piore
> found that employers instructed engineers to pursue the single-minded goal
> of developing methods to reduce labor inputs, without regard for the more
> rational criterion of overall cost minimization. He went on to say:
>   ##Virtually without exception, the engineers distrusted hourly labor and
> admitted a tendency to substitute capital whenever they had the discretion
> to do so. As one engineer explained, "if the cost comparison favored labor
> but we were close, I would mechanize anyway." [Piore 1968, p. 610]
>
>
>
>
>
> Michael Perelman
>
> Economics Department
>
> California State University
>
> michael dot perelman at gmail.com
>
> Chico, CA 95929
>
> 530-898-5321
>
> fax 530-898-5901
>
> www.michaelperelman.wordpress.com
>
>
>
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gar Lipow
> Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2013 1:01 AM
> To: LBO; Progressive Economists List
> Subject: [Pen-l] Corporate decision making - some empirical data
>
>
>
> There has been some argument back and forth as to whether capitalists act in
> their narrow individual self interest, or in the narrow interests of the
> businesses they run rather than from class interest.  (This by the way is
> separate from the question of whether they consciously do so. The 2nd
> requires the first, but the first does not automatically imply the 2nd).
>
>
>
> One of the things about the work I do on global warming, is that there is a
> ton of empirical data that I think sheds light on this question. For example
> firms pass up  all sorts of profitable opportunities to save energy, often
> in favor of LESS profitable opportunities to save labor. Of course no
> manager knows for sure what an investment will yield but the point is that
> managers demand MUCH higher rates of return on energy savings investments
> than they do for savings in labor.  If you look at risk-adjusted return, the
> discrepancy is even higher, because managers will choose much riskier
> opportunities to cut labor costs over safer opportunities to save labor.
> Incidentally I refer to energy, because that is what I focus on, and where a
> lot of the data is. But as far as I can tell this also applies to water and
> raw materials. Basically business people treat labor, differently from
> other flow costs.  Saving labor is a "core investment". Saving energy or raw
> material is not.
>
>
>
> So that for energy (and all non-core flow costs)  heuristics are used that
> are not applied to core investments. Most studies find that one of two
> factors overwhelmingly determine whether and energy saving investment is
> made:
>
>
>
> 1) Simple payback - usually of two years or less. Note that an investment
> with a lower simple payback but that keeps paying back costs for longer may
> be more profitable even when a high discount rate is used.
>
>
>
> 2) Total size of investment.
>
>
>
> Incidentally, one outlying study, but based on a really large database show
> that projects that are listed first in  a set of proposals are 25% more
> likely to be approved than those listed further on. It is an outlier, not
> because anyone has refuted it, but because no one has made any effort to
> replicate the result. My amused guess is that no tries to replicate it
> because they fear they might get similar results rather than showing it to
> be an artifact or error.
>
>
>
> So class analysis of the type Wojo thinks is wrong would say that energy and
> raw materials and water do not go on strike, while workers sometime do.
>
>
>
> Alternatively, one could argue that this is just a cultural artifact and has
> nothing to do with class - that global business culture just has not caught
> up with the fact the direct labor is a much smaller percent of flow costs
> than it was up to the mid 20th century . (Capital investment and
> depreciation is not a flow cost in the same sense that water or energy or
> raw materials are.)
>
>
>
> I think that would be to overlook  how strongly the culture of business is
> tied to control. Control over workers as a core value is not coincidental,
> but very much tied to class.
>
>
>
> Incidentally, though in a lot of cases, I'm sure this is reproduced without
> conscious consideration of class, often managers are very much aware of
> class issues. For example, energy intensive industries often hire energy
> managers. And such energy managers, knowing that a lot of opportunities to
> save energy with a factory are very specific to that factory, want to
> interview the workers who may know stuff that happens on the shop floor that
> operations managers don't. And sometimes that is fine, but often they get a
> lot of managerial resistance to doing this. "What you want advice from them
> monkeys on how to run the zoo?"
>
>
>
> Of course class is the beginning rather than the end of analysis.  But even
> if it is a first step, it is not one that can be skipped.
>
>
>
> A list of sources on this follows. The "Monkey's running the zoo" quote is
> from personal conversations with energy managers.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Jerry Jackson. 2010. “Promoting energy efficiency investments with risk
> management decision tools.” Energy Policy 38(8):3865-73.
>
> Catherine Cooremans. 2012. “Investment in energy efficiency: do the
> characteristics of investments matter?” Energy Efficiency 5(4): 497-518.
>
> Surash Muthulingam, Charles J Corbett, Shlomo Benartzi, Bohdan Oppenheim
> 2009. Managerial Biases and Energy Savings: An Empirical Analysis of the
> Adoption of Process Improvement Recommendations. Los Angeles: Anderson
> School of Management – University of California Los Angeles.
>
> Anderson, Soren T.; Newell, Richard G. 2004. Information programs for
> technology adoption: the case of energy-efficiency audits. Resource and
> Energy Economics 26(1):27-50.
>
> Ramon Luis Maria Abadie, Arigoni Ortiz and Ibon Galarraga. 2010. The
> Determinants of Energy Efficiency Investments in the U.S.
> Bilbao,Spain:Basque Center for Climate Change.
>
> --
>
> Facebook: Gar Lipow  Twitter: GarLipow
> Solving the Climate Crisis web page: SolvingTheClimateCrisis.com
> Grist Blog: http://grist.org/author/gar-lipow/
> Online technical reference: http://www.nohairshirts.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pen-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
>
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to