I th ink Tom Walker and Eugene Coyle will find this of interest, not
because they will agree with all of it, but that it is always interesting
when someone comes to a similar conclusion to oneself from a very different
perspective.

http://www.raptitude.com/2010/07/your-lifestyle-has-already-been-designed/

I think the author is ignoring the history of the 40  hour week - how it
was not "designed" but fought for. Still if you substitute 'point at which
capitalists resistance to worker demand for short work week rose sharply"
for "designed" I think this article  does make a good point. A work week
much below 40 hours gives workers too much energy and too much freedom -
too well rested to be good little consumers. Because enough free time and
people start socializing with one another in ways that may reduce demand
for consumer goods. Also more free time risk people becoming more informed
and creates a better environment for activism. And it is not just more time
but more energy. Can't track in down, but I remember Tom Walker wrote a few
years back on how ~40 hours is the sweet spot on the curve  for
capitalists.  Not that capitalists have not pushed back that gain so many
work far more than 40 hours. But I think both this and Walkers article of a
few years back makes the point that reduction of work time significantly
below 40 hours is a fundamental change from the 40  hour week, not just
more of the same. Maybe we can think of it as a step function. The change
from sweatshop conditions to getting significant time off is one radical
step. The reduction down to a 40 hour week is a second radical step.
Reduction to say a 30 hour week would be another radical step. Each step is
radical in the sense that they change life qualitatively not just
quantitatively have serious implications for the power of working people
vs. capitalists. Of course working hours reflect that balance of power, but
they also affect it.

The article I've linked above is ahistorical and deeply flawed. And yet,
the link between a too-long work week and much of the pain in our society
is so worth emphasizing that I think it is worth reading, flaws and all.

-- 
Facebook: Gar Lipow  Twitter: GarLipow
Solving the Climate Crisis web page: SolvingTheClimateCrisis.com
Grist Blog: http://grist.org/author/gar-lipow/
Online technical reference: http://www.nohairshirts.com
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to