What Planet Are We On?
Why Washington Can’t Stop
The Coming Era of Tiny Wars and Micro-Conflicts
By Tom Engelhardt
TomDispatch.com
October 24 2013
In terms of pure projectable power, there’s never been anything like it. Its
military has divided the world -- the whole planet -- into six “commands.” Its
fleet, with 11aircraft carrier battle groups, rules the seas and has done so
largely unchallenged for almost seven decades. Its Air Force has ruled the
global skies, and despite being almost continuously in action for years, hasn’t
faced an enemy plane since 1991 or been seriously challenged anywhere since the
early 1970s. Its fleet of drone aircraft has proven itself capable of
targeting and killing suspected enemies in the backlands of the planet from
Afghanistan and Pakistan to Yemen and Somalia with little regard for national
boundaries, and none at all for the possibility of being shot down.
It funds and trains proxy armies on several continents and has complex aid and
training relationships with militaries across the planet. On hundreds of
bases, some tiny and others the size of American towns, its soldiers garrison
the globe from Italyto Australia, Honduras to Afghanistan, and on islands from
Okinawa in the Pacific Ocean to Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean. Its weapons
makers are the most advanced on Earth and dominate the global arms market. Its
nuclear weaponry in silos, on bombers, and on its fleet of submarines would be
capable of destroying several planets the size of Earth. Its system of spy
satellites is unsurpassed and unchallenged. Its intelligence services can
listen in on the phone calls or read the emails of almost anyone in the world
from top foreign leaders to obscure insurgents.
The CIA and its expanding paramilitary forces are capable of kidnapping people
of interest just about anywhere from rural Macedonia to the streets of Rome and
Tripoli. For its many prisoners, it has set up (and dismantled)secret jails
across the planet and on its naval vessels. It spends more on its military
than the next most powerful 13 states combined. Add in the spending for its
full national security state and it towers over any conceivable group of other
nations.
[. ]
Despite this stunning global power equation, for more than a decade we have
been given a lesson in what a military, no matter how overwhelming, can and
(mostly) can’t do in the twenty-first century, in what a military, no matter
how staggeringly advanced, does and (mostly) does not translate into on the
current version of planet Earth.
Let’s start with what the U.S. can do. On this, the recent record is clear: it
can destroy and destabilize. In fact, wherever U.S. military power has been
applied in recent years, if there has been any lasting effect at all, it has
been to destabilize whole regions.
[. ]
If the overwhelming military power at the command of Washington can destabilize
whole regions of the planet, what, then, can’t such military power do? On
this, the record is no less clear and just as decisive. As every significant
U.S. military action of this new century has indicated, the application of
military force, no matter in what form, has proven incapable of achieving even
Washington’s most minimal goals of the moment.
[. ]
Washington’s military plans and tactics since 9/11 have been a spectacular
train wreck. When you look back, counterinsurgency doctrine, resuscitated from
the ashes of America’s defeat in Vietnam, is once again on the scrap heap of
history. (Who today even remembers its key organizing phrase -- “clear, hold,
and build” -- which now looks like the punch line for some malign joke?)
“Surges,” once hailed as brilliant military strategy, have already disappeared
into the mists. “Nation-building,” once a term of tradecraft in Washington, is
in the doghouse. “Boots on the ground,” of which the U.S. had enormous numbers
and still has 51,000 in Afghanistan, are now a no-no. The American public is,
everyone universally agrees, “exhausted” with war. Major American armies
arriving to fight anywhere on the Eurasian continent in the foreseeable future?
Don’t count on it.
But lessons learned from the collapse of war policy? Don’t count on that,
either. It’s clear enough that Washington still can’t fully absorb what’s
happened. Its faith in war remains remarkably unbroken in a century in which
military power has become the American political equivalent of a state
religion. Our leaders are still high on the counterterrorism wars of the
future, even as they drown in their military efforts of the present. Their
urge is still to rejigger and reimagine what a deliverable military solution
would be.
Now the message is: skip those boots en masse -- in fact, cut down on their
numbers in the age of the sequester -- and go for the counterterrorism package.
No more spilling of (American) blood. Get the “bad guys,” one or a few at a
time, using the president’s private army, the Special Operations forces, or his
private air force, the CIA’s drones. Build new barebones micro-bases globally.
Move those aircraft carrier battle groups off the coast of whatever country you
want to intimidate.
It’s clear we’re entering a new period in terms of American war making. Call
it the era of tiny wars, or micro-conflicts, especially in the tribal backlands
of the planet.
[. ]
Full: http://www.tomdispatch.com/blog/175763/
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
