I'll pity the rich, alright -- but only AFTER they are dispossessed.

On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Perelman, Michael
<[email protected]>wrote:

> The Shame Project took him apart.
>
>
> Michael Perelman
> Economics Department
> California State University
> michael dot perelman at gmail.com
> Chico, CA 95929
> 530-898-5321
> fax 530-898-5901
> www.michaelperelman.wordpress.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Chuck Grimes
> Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 11:35 AM
> To: Progressive Economics
> Subject: Re: [Pen-l] Malcolm Gladwell's New Book Asks Us To Pity the Rich
>
>
> > Gladwell is a total dick. Here's my take on his technophobia:
> >
> > http://louisproyect.org/2010/10/17/revolutionary-politics-and-social-n
> > etworking/
>
>
> The Internet has as revolutionary a potential as the Gutenberg press had
> in the 1600s. Louis Proyect
>
> ------------
>
> (I just realized the blog post on Malcolm Gladwell goes back to Oct 2010.)
>
> I could quibble, but won't. There are many other little notes that I agree
> with, particularly the note on Lenin and the newspaper. From Trotsky's
> writing, T was constantly getting a hold of a newpaper printing shop to put
> out essays and diatribes for the cause, and usually lasted only a few
> months until the authorities tracked down the shop and threw them out.
>
> Since I took printmaking and knew something about art printing, it was fun
> to read about these fly by night news rags. The early 20thC presses were
> technical marvels, but not that technical that the skills couldn't be
> learned on the job pretty quickly. That kind of closeness between writing
> and producing printed material made it a great medium for revolution. The
> parallel isn't to social network media, but video, on line mags, email
> lists, and blogs where the capacity is greater and you don't need to know
> someone to get the information or produce it.
>
> ``That's the position we are in today. We no longer are at the mercy of a
> crappy magazine like The New Yorker that propagandized relentlessly for the
> war in Iraq. Through the Internet we can spread the word without relying on
> the high priesthood of the corporate media..'' (LP)
>
> The addition of a central media source like AJE was (until it disappeared
> into a cable show), a real hub of distribution. I could pick up a story
> from them, watch a short documentary, listen to a panel, and then follow
> events elsewhere. It really reproduced the Egyptian revolution live, so the
> revolution was televised once. RT and France 24 were additional help on
> some levels as was Democracy Now. They all came together again for events
> in Europe and later in the US with OWS.
>
> The social media was good for sewing together a large crowd so it could
> communicate with itself and attract, report, and interact with participant
> families, friends, and of course be monitored by its enemies.
>
> You can bet that the NSA and Euro equivalents were working 24/7 + OT to
> keep up with these events, their factions, and feeding the Egyptian
> military, other Arab elite sectors, and Israel information---on one of
> those `close ties' ... as well as ploting out somekind of foreign policy
> response.
>
> When OWS hit the US, it took a few weeks to organize a unified national
> reaction through police channels on how to deal with the small but
> effective demos here. That's a story that hasn't been fully developed, but
> it was apparent there was some kind of backdoor police collusion across the
> country. At a guess it probably involved Homeland Security and the NSA
> along with whatever federal agencies supply state police with their weapons
> and communication infrastructure. The establishment reactions on the East
> coast were far more coordinated than on the West Coast. I don't want to go
> off the deep end conspiracy---but some kind of national coordination of
> responses was going on.
>
> Really that needs to be investigated as a deep background story to
> illuminate just how government agencies were involved.
>
> CG
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pen-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
> _______________________________________________
> pen-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
>



-- 
Cheers,

Tom Walker (Sandwichman)
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to