NY Times October 30, 2013
On Council, de Blasio Blended Idealism With Push for Power
By DAVID M. HALBFINGER, KATE TAYLOR and DAVID W. CHEN

The Brooklyn Democrats had always been a sleepy, collegial group on the 
City Council. Until Bill de Blasio made his first big play for power.

On a bright December afternoon in 2003, nine of them were abruptly 
summoned to the office of Mr. de Blasio, a newly re-elected Park Slope 
councilman with high-minded liberal notions about open government, and 
more than a little ambition of his own.

A piece of paper awaited them: a blank signature sheet declaring support 
for Mr. de Blasio’s bid to wrest the chairmanship of the borough’s 
Council delegation away from Lewis A. Fidler, a forceful Sheepshead Bay 
Democrat with deep roots in the party organization.

Mr. de Blasio, who is now the Democratic nominee for mayor of New York, 
had wooed his colleagues with idealistic promises: to galvanize the 
Brooklyn delegation into a cohesive legislative bloc, to democratize an 
appropriations process that Mr. Fidler had run autocratically and to 
share the chairmanship with a trailblazing black councilman.

But Mr. de Blasio, an experienced political operative, was leaving 
nothing to chance. He needed nine votes, a majority of the 17-member 
delegation. When he was confident he had nine supporters, he immediately 
asked them to declare their support in writing, all at the same time in 
the same room.

“It was like locking people in, almost literally,” recalled one of those 
who milled about awkwardly in the room until the deed, finally, was 
done. The person, fearing recriminations if Mr. de Blasio is elected 
mayor, spoke on the condition of anonymity.

(snip)

Mr. de Blasio was an ardent proponent of affordable housing and argued 
that one way to create more of it was to squeeze developers to include 
it in their projects.

But again and again, civic advocates say, projects supported by Mr. de 
Blasio in the name of building homes for working- and middle-class New 
Yorkers failed to deliver as promised.

“The moment you talk to him about development, he says affordable 
housing,” said Katia Kelly, a Carroll Gardens civic advocate and author 
of a popular neighborhood blog. “I wish somebody would ask him how many 
units of affordable housing have actually been built in the district 
during his time as a councilman.”

(The answer: 530, according to city officials. Some districts in 
Brooklyn had thousands.)

Mr. de Blasio’s first major battle over affordable housing came in 2003, 
in one of the Bloomberg administration’s first land-use overhauls: the 
rezoning of Brooklyn’s Fourth Avenue to permit tall buildings, while 
capping heights much lower in the adjacent residential blocks.

Mr. de Blasio pressed to require developers to include apartments for 
low- and moderate-income residents. The Bloomberg administration 
resisted, however, and Mr. de Blasio relented. Instead, the city 
included $6 million in subsidies to encourage developers to build 
affordable units, but the money sat unused while expensive, bulky 
apartment towers rose. (The city eventually embraced Mr. de Blasio’s idea.)

Later in his tenure, Mr. de Blasio opposed making the fetid Gowanus 
Canal a federal Superfund site, saying the city could do a better job of 
cleaning it up. But his opposition raised eyebrows because Mr. de Blasio 
was also supporting a proposed luxury condominium project along the 
canal that he said would include affordable units; when the canal was 
made a Superfund site, the developer walked away.

But it was the Atlantic Yards project, a gigantic housing and arena 
development at the intersection of Flatbush and Atlantic Avenues, that 
cemented the image of Mr. de Blasio in some critics’ minds as a 
too-willing partner for developers.

Eric McClure, a founder of the civic group Park Slope Neighbors, met 
with Mr. de Blasio, hoping that 2,200 signatures he had gathered on a 
petition would be enough to turn the councilman into a critic of the 
project. He did not succeed; Mr. de Blasio argued that development was 
needed to create affordable housing.

“He was insistent,” Mr. McClure recalled. “We had an affordable housing 
crisis, sometimes you have to do certain things to get that affordable 
housing built that might rub people the wrong way, but that was the 
ultimate goal, and for that reason he was for the project.”

Mr. de Blasio, according to Mr. McClure, acknowledged that Fourth Avenue 
“had not turned out the way he hoped.” But he argued that Atlantic Yards 
would be different, because Acorn, a community organizing group with 
which he had a long association, had joined the developer, Forest City 
Ratner, to see that the affordable housing was built.

The Barclays Center arena opened in 2012, but the first affordable 
apartments are still at least a year away. Critics say that Mr. de 
Blasio was too close to the developer, Bruce Ratner, who hosted a 
birthday fund-raiser for him, and did not push the firm, Forest City 
Ratner, to deliver the promised housing.

On Monday Mr. de Blasio blamed some “objective reasons” for the delay, 
but said “it’s clearly behind schedule,” and allowed that “there were 
missteps by everyone involved.” He said the next mayor needed to hold 
Forest City Ratner and state officials accountable.

“On my watch, it will happen,” he vowed.


_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to