On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Carrol Cox <[email protected]> wrote: > Raghu: Is this a sign that a portion of the Establishment is pushing back > against the surveillance state? > > Yes, of course. Some portion of any group or collective agency "pushes > back" against current policy of the group. It's part of the way in which > policy becomes fully institutionalized. > > But don't expect the Congress to dissolve Homeland Security or the CIA in > the near future. >
Ah, but that's the National Security State, not to be confused with the Surveillance State. The two are inter-linked no doubt, but have their own distinct identities. -raghu.
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
