Henwood's piece is a conversation starter but his recommendations (dreams?) to 
fix things by "Raising the incomes of the bottom 90 percent of the population 
through higher wages and public spending initiatives" he has often ridiculed on 
Pen-l as unobtainable.  His essay, nevertheless, is the best of the odd 
assortment.

Brad DeLong says, of the future, "The optimistic view is that our collective 
ingenuity will create so many things for people to do that are so attractive to 
the rich that they will pay through the nose for them and so recreate a 
middle-class society."  Thus, once again Say's Law is the way to save 
ourselves.  Invent some attractive product, the rich will buy it, we'll all go 
back to work.  That can be found as well in the latest book by Brynjolfsson and 
McAfee, The Second Machine Age.  In that book they also plump for the latest 
fad on the right, a guaranteed income/negative income tax.  Capitalists will 
give people a meager existence (what DeLong hopes would be a RISING meager 
existence) if they will leave capitalists alone to exploit nature, including 
humans.

Michael Strain puts all his bets on the social safety net for the "truly needy" 
to correct the excesses of the free enterprise system.  (Note the means test.)  
I guess that's cheaper than DeLong's version but more or less the same.  I'd 
send this one back without a grade.

Tyler Cowan:  How much time were these students given for the essay?  Cowan has 
recycled some stuff already published repeatedly and so can't be given a grade. 
 Shouldn't an effort of originality be required?   Cowan would break the 
teachers' unions and tell people not to be NIMBYs and that would address "... 
many of today’s economic problems ...  ."  Really, he wrote that!

Yves Smith said very little but I have to give her an A- for her conclusion:  
"But as long as there is a sufficiently large remnant of the American middle 
class, still socialized to identify with the established order, no matter how 
beleaguered they are, it's hard to see how any organized, large scale uprising 
could occur."  Echos of echos of Carrol Cox.

The grades (on a curve) turned out to be:  Henwood = A.  Smith A-.  Strain & 
Cowan each get dropped from the class.  DeLong =  D-.




On Mar 30, 2014, at 5:36 PM, Louis Proyect <[email protected]> wrote:

> http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2014/03/30/was-marx-right/a-return-to-a-world-marx-would-have-known
> _______________________________________________
> pen-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to