Hans,

I wrote something about Nordhaus and Schellenbarger a few years ago when their 
book appeared.  I circulated this to a select group, but maybe it will be 
useful to you.  

My comment:

Break Through is a reckless book. 
 
There have been a number of reviews of Break Through, the hot new book with a 
fix for global warming by Nordhaus & Schellenberger (N&S).  This is not a 
review but just a comment on the authors’ destructive policy recommendation: 
“Business as usual with clean energy.”  Clean energy is to be desired but 
business as usual is an unfolding disaster.
 
The authors’ trade, and they are evidently good at it, is packaging 
environmental issues in ways that will sell to the public and legislators.  
Their approach has been to find the positives in a good policy and to stress 
those. 
 
In this book, though, they started backwards.  They chose a policy that can be 
spun as a positive.  The book asserts that we can have business and consumption 
as usual, and with aspirations confirmed for even greater future consumption.  
Break Through brings the good news:  “You can have it all.”
 
Limits on emissions – mainstream environmentalism’s approach – is understood by 
the public, Nordhaus and Schellenberger say, as limits on the public’s 
aspirations for the future.  Limits tells the public, they believe, that the 
future is limited, America’s best times are in the past, and their jobs are 
threatened.  This is bad news and Nordhaus and Schellenberger pitch good news. 
 
The book goes wrong by resting on the 1943 widely taught insight of Abraham 
Maslow that once humans have secure food and shelter, their goals address love 
and self-esteem.  N & S translate that into a dream of a dematerialized future, 
where consumption will be constrained by individuals self-actualizing and no 
longer seeking esteem by having more toys than others.  That is beyond 
ingenuousness. 
 
Popular books like Cornell economist Robert Frank’s Luxury Fever show that 
esteem comes from having more.  Deploring the race to outdo neighbors, Frank 
nevertheless ends the book with a confession of replacing his kitchen stove 
with a model with two 15,000 BTU burners.  Nor are the rest of us exempt from 
aspiring to what others more affluent have.  That is why the Chinese buy cars.
 
  Consumption is learned behavior and we learn from those richer than 
ourselves.  At the secure little house on the prairie the children didn’t dream 
of iPods but now have them.  Veblen nailed it when he said invention is the 
mother of necessity.  Nordhaus and Schellenberger could have understood this by 
observing their neighbors, or downloading Waylon Jennings’ “Luckenbach Texas” 
for 99 cents.
 
  Veblen wrote of this 100 years ago in The Theory of the Leisure Class.  
Consumers are not autonomous, though economics textbooks aver that we are.  
There is solid economic theory on consumer behavior but professors won’t teach 
it, preferring to assume a fully differentiable mathematical function.  
 
Nordhaus and Schellenberger leap from Maslow to a future with dematerialized 
lifestyles, though mysteriously the economy they describe will nevertheless 
keep growing and jobs will proliferate.  Break Through is a hodge-podge of 
assertions, evidence, and contradictions on the future of consumer behavior.  
They begin with Maslow and Voluntary Simplicity but by page 162 they assert
 
“Rising prosperity has resulted in an increased orientation toward personal 
freedom and choice.  But these values, combined with greater affluence and 
declining expectations and optimism have resulted in rising materialism, 
outer-directed status-oriented behaviors, and fatalistic survival values.”     
 
To offer a promising rather than a limited future N & S propose massive public 
expenditure on technological breakthroughs – billions, tens of billions spent 
on solar, on wind, a modern electric grid, batteries, cars powered by 
electricity generated on the owner’s dwelling – massive spending to find the 
next big things.  The spending will promote jobs and income growth and the 
results will restore America’s technological leadership, while the Chinese will 
benefit by producing what America invents.
 
Hillary Clinton and other candidates echo the “jobs, jobs, jobs” message of the 
book.  Not a surprise, since Break Through is a campaign consultant’s handbook. 
 It is about what can sell, not what can work.  Will their vision of marvelous 
worldwide prosperity result in worsening environmental problems beyond global 
warming?  The book answers “No.”  That reckless answer is false.
 
Eugene P. Coyle
November 27, 2007

On Jun 2, 2014, at 8:58 AM, <[email protected]> 
<[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> 
> Here in Salt Lake City we have an opportunity to discuss with Ted
> Nordhaus.  What questions / remarks would Pen-l-ers direct at Ted if you
> were present?  Please help us, we will take your suggestions and report
> back how he responded.  Here is the announcement sent out
> at the Utah Energy list:
> 
> < snip >

_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to