I have begun to see this fatuous analysis everywhere -- Tyler Cowan in 
the NYT, even Jeremy Rifkin, no whiz but usually more careful.  Today's 
example is from the Wall St. Journal.

By turning the WSJ into trash, Murdock allowed fools access to the 
paper.

"What Today's Economic Gloomsayers Are Missing
Science is enabling invention like never before and in ways that will 
improve life but isn't captured by GDP statistics."
by JOEL MOKYR  (Mr. Mokyr is professor of economics and history at 
Northwestern University.)

full article at:                =
http://online.wsj.com/articles/joel-mokyr-what-todays-economic-gloomsayers=
-are-missing-1407536487?mod=3Dhp_opinion

After extolling the wonders of science and technology, Mokyr says:

> Many new goods and services are expensive to design, but once they 
work, they can be copied at very low or zero cost. That means they tend 
to contribute little to measured output even if their impact on consumer 
welfare is very large. Economic assessment based on aggregates such as 
gross domestic product will become increasingly misleading, as 
innovation accelerates. Dealing with altogether new goods and services 
was not what these numbers were designed for, despite heroic efforts by 
Bureau of Labor Statistics statisticians.

Yes things can be copied at low cost, but that doesn't mean they will be 
sold at a low price.  Hasn't Mokyr been reading the WSJ's articles on 
the new drugs for Heptitas C?  One new drug, Sovaldi, is priced at 
$1,000.00 a pill and treatment requires 84 doses -- 84 days for a total 
of $84,000.  Producing the pill costs very little.  (We know that 
because the Drug company is selling it in Egypt for, --  instead of 
$84,000 per customer --  $900,  a 99% discount.  The vendor is 
presumably making money at that price in Egypt, not including overhead 
costs.  That pill is showing up in the US GDP statistics as $84,000 per 
customer. 


Marginal cost isn't total cost, a professor of economics should have 
learned that.

Gene
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to