http://s-usih.org/2014/08/explaining-the-rise-of-law-and-economics.html


                Three Ways of Explaining the Rise of “Law and Economics,” and 
Also, One Way (Guest Post by Sara Mayeux)

                                
                        Posted on August 23, 2014  by  L.D. Burnett             
                        

        
                
[The
 following is a guest post by Sara Mayeux, a Sharswood Fellow at the 
University of Pennsylvania Law School and a PhD candidate in history at 
Stanford. Her research focuses on the history of American criminal law 
and institutions. She can be found on Twitter at @saramayeux.]
[snip]


But the real star of Teles’s account is Henry Manne, “the movement’s 
first organization entrepreneur” (101). Across stints at George 
Washington University, the University of Rochester, the University of 
Miami, and Emory, and ultimately as dean of the George Mason University 
Law School, Manne proved a tireless organizer who, through trial and 
error, became adept at securing funding from conservative and 
libertarian patrons such as the Olin Foundation and the Liberty Fund. At
 Rochester, Manne hosted summer economics seminars for law professors, 
designed to equip them with microeconomics tools that they could 
incorporate in their scholarship. In 1973, he turned down an offer at 
Yale and instead moved to Miami, where he could have free rein to start a
 Law and Economics Center and do whatever he wanted with it. There, 
Manne continued to host gatherings of law professors and also started an
 annual institute for federal judges, giving them a free trip to a 
luxury South Florida resort in exchange for sitting through two weeks of
 economics seminars. “At its height, in 1990,” Teles notes, “the 
Economics Institute for Federal Judges hosted 40 percent of the federal 
judiciary, including [then-appellate judges] Ruth Bader Ginsburg and 
Clarence Thomas” (113).
Manne’s programs, Teles concludes, were important not just or even 
primarily because they equipped lawyers and judges with economics 
concepts, but because they symbolically “helped erase law and economics’
 stigma, since if judges … took the ideas seriously, they could not be 
crazy and irresponsible” (217). Although Manne’s organizing efforts hit 
upon several roadblocks due to personality conflicts and, ultimately, a 
falling out with the Olin Foundation, over the long run, he proved 
remarkably successful at promoting and institutionalizing law and 
economics within the legal academy. Indeed, Teles suggests that, without
 Manne’s unique entrepreneurial talents, “it is far from certain that 
anyone else would have built the movement’s organizational 
infrastructure” (133).

[Henry Manne, the man who launched thousands of inside traders who incessantly 
capture the so-called rents of monetary nihilism]
                                          
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to