http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-wine-cheese-fight-20141005-story.html

 Stew over European food names complicates trade talks - LA Times
By EVAN HALPER, DON LEE
October 4, 2014

As Europe and the United States pursue a lofty vision of a free trade pact that 
removes tariffs and eases regulatory burdens, it's not just disputes over 
automobile safety and digital privacy that are creating tensions.

It is wine and cheese. And the sausage that goes with it.

European leaders say they can't allow cheese produced outside Italy to be 
passed off as Parmesan. Feta? That's only from Greece. If a wine label says 
Chateau, they say, it must be fermented in France.

And don't get them started on California Chablis, the white wine named for a 
village in the Burgundy region of France.

The aggressive campaign to protect European-designated product names with 
origins on the continent is gaining traction as countries in Asia and Latin 
America agree to the terms.

The intellectual property battle has caused near panic in the U.S. agriculture 
industry and is complicating prospects for a transatlantic trade agreement 
involving half the world's economy.

When U.S. trade negotiators met with their European counterparts last week at a 
conference center in a Washington suburb, the food fight was on the agenda. It 
will stay there when the talks resume in Europe later this year.

The negotiations are behind closed doors, but in public, the Obama 
administration is showing no sign of yielding to the European demands.

"In this area, we have long-standing differences with the EU," said Trevor 
Kincaid, a spokesman for the office of the U.S. Trade Representative.

The Obama administration is walking a tightrope, however, defending the rights 
of American companies to use what they consider generic European food names but 
avoiding heated rhetoric around the issue, which could upset the broader trade 
negotiations.

But pressure is growing from American food companies big and small.

Giant California vineyards don't want more countries to go the way of Canada, 
which has banned non-French companies from selling products labeled Champagne. 
California vineyards were forced to change their Canada-bound bubbly labels to 
"sparkling wine."

Artisan cheese makers in Wisconsin fear huge losses if they are banned overseas 
from selling American-made feta, Parmesan, Asiago, Havarti and other cheeses 
with European names.

Europeans say they are only protecting their heritage — and their wallets — 
from foreign imitations.

"If you make a cheese from Wisconsin, good, you can call it cheese of 
Wisconsin," said Elio De Tullio, a trademark attorney in Rome who represents 
numerous cheese producers in Italy. "But why do you call it Parma, or Taleggio 
or Provolone? It's not fair. Because you are trying to grab the reputation of 
the other. You should pay royalty."

The idea that Parmesan could only come from northern Italy is bewildering to 
the folks at Sartori Cheese in Plymouth, Wis., the self-named cheese capital of 
the world.

The founder, an Italian immigrant named Paolo Sartori, started making top-shelf 
hard cheeses 75 years ago after supposedly studying techniques from an Italian 
count he met while crossing the Atlantic.

In 2011, the Wisconsin company won top honors for best Parmesan at the highly 
respected Global Cheese Awards in Britain. The winning cheese, with its "subtle 
fruity note and finishes with a caramelized Parmesan flavor that blossoms on 
the palate," beat out the many Italian contenders.

Italian cheese makers squawked. And the next year, the Parmesan category was 
eliminated, replaced with a category for Parmigiano Reggiano, which can only 
legally come from certain regions in Italy.

"The Europeans are scared because there are a lot of U.S. companies that are 
making great cheese," said Jeff Schwager, president of Sartori Cheese.

The Wisconsin Legislature declared the European labeling campaign abusive and 
passed a unanimous resolution in April calling on the Obama administration to 
fight back.

Greek yogurt and even bologna, that staple of school lunch boxes, are also 
under siege.

Chobani, based in upstate New York and America's largest producer of Greek 
yogurt, was ordered to stop selling its product in Britain after a competitor 
complained in court that it was not made in Greece.

Dozens of U.S. senators rushed to defend American-made bologna earlier this 
year, calling on the Obama administration to challenge agreements in Latin 
American countries that could prohibit its sale there under that specific label.

The administration can do little more than raise objections. For now, the 
sausage clauses still stand in Latin America.

Europeans are also starting to explore agreements that reach beyond food and 
into textiles, which could include placing protections on products like Argyle 
socks.

At the core of the European push is economics, with pressure to appease 
powerful farm lobbies across the continent when cash-strapped governments are 
cutting agricultural subsidies and struggling with a debt crisis.

But European identity and culture are also at play. Local wines, cheeses and 
other items carry heavy emotional baggage.

"What they're arguing is, 'Look, this is a classic example of big international 
U.S. agribusiness trampling traditional food suppliers under their big Yankee 
boots,'" said Jacob Kirkegaard, a senior fellow at the nonpartisan Peterson 
Institute for International Economics in Washington.

He called the effort to protect product names a hot-button political issue in 
much of Europe, like gun control in the United States.

"It's an argument that in these local communities has significant political 
weight," he said.

Some American firms sympathize.

A coalition of high-end vintners in Napa, which has been working to protect the 
Napa Valley wine label from counterfeit and other misuse in China and 
elsewhere, says the U.S. effort to protect American use of European wine names 
is wrong.

"If we would like the respect of our name, we think others should have it as 
well," said Hailey Trefethen, a vintner at her family's vineyard here at the 
foot of the Napa Valley. The estate is a designated historic landmark where 
winemaking began 130 years ago, and the stately cellar is made with giant 
old-growth redwood beams.

"Some of the best sparkling wine made in the U.S. is coming out of Napa," she 
said. "None of them use the name Champagne. They could, legally. But they 
don't."

Trefethen's opinion is hardly prevailing among California winemakers, who sell 
millions of bottles labeled Champagne each year.

The Wine Institute, which advocates for more than 1,000 wineries in California, 
chafes at the notion that California vineyards could easily give up names on 
labels that their brands have been wrapped in for decades.

"It is easy to say it is not onerous for someone else to do something," said 
Tom LaFaille, international trade counsel at the San Francisco-based group. "It 
takes years to change a brand."
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to