I was alluding to the example of the U.S. in the 1950s, where "30 for 40" was a slogan that degenerated into an expendable bargaining chip. There are some things you actually don't realize, Louis. But of course those things you don't realize you don't realize them. If I were you I would refrain from using the phrase as a snide putdown. Thankfully, I'm not.
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Louis Proyect <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10/7/14 7:53 PM, Tom Walker wrote: > > There is often a case that can be made up front about "30 for 40" but > > "30 for 30" has a much, much better chance than "40 for 40" does of > > evolving into "30 for 40." Sectarians will righteously sacrifice a > > principle to uphold a slogan. > > In Russia? I didn't realize the mass movement was that powerful. > _______________________________________________ > pen-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l > -- Cheers, Tom Walker (Sandwichman)
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
