http://policynotes.arl.org/?p=892 Library Copyright Alliance Expresses Concerns Over “Fast Track” Trade Promotion Authority
On February 5, 2015, ARL, together with ALA and ACRL, sent a letter to Senators Hatch (R-UT) and Wyden (D-VT) expressing concerns over “fast track” trade promotion authority <http://www.librarycopyrightalliance.org/bm%7Edoc/wyden-hatch-fast-track-trade-promotion.pdf>. Under “fast track,” Congress grants the President authority to sign trade agreements and Congress is only able to approve or reject the agreement in a straight up-down vote, meaning that it cannot amend this agreement. Such a process limits Congress’ ability to meaningfully weigh in on the agreement. Using the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP) as an example, the letter highlights the inequities surrounding access to information about the substance of the agreements. While the negotiations are conducted in secrecy and the general public is not permitted to see text, cleared advisors are permitted to view proposals and make substantive comments through “trade advisory committees.” Members of the intellectual property trade advisory committee represent large corporate interests; current members include, for example, representatives from the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) and the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC). Past representatives include Time Warner, the Association of American Publishers (AAP) and the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA). While these corporate interests are well represented, the general public has had to rely on leaks <http://policynotes.arl.org/?p=862>in order to view text. The letter points out, “Policy should not be made in secret, with the general public kept in the dark about what effects the agreement will have.” The letter also notes concerns that the comprehensive intellectual property chapter included in the TPP could contain provision requiring changes to current law, or locking-in undesirable provisions of U.S. law which would make it difficult to amend the law without violating the agreement. One such harmful provision is the U.S. copyright term of life plus seventy years, which was recently reported <http://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/english/news/20150203_05.html> as the term of protection TPP negotiators have agreed to. This lengthy term has been problematic <http://policynotes.arl.org/?p=869>, contributing to the orphan works problem and hampering the public domain. The letter concludes: Given the impacts that agreements like the TPP and TTIP will have, Congress should ensure that it does not delegate its authority to the Executive Branch. Congress must be an active participant in reviewing these agreements before accepting their content and should not grant fast track authority, at least with respect to intellectual property provisions in these agreements. Alternatively, if legislation on fast track does include language on intellectual property, this language must protect the careful balance that exists in US law. Libraries, and the vast public we serve, depend on a balanced copyright system, including important limitations and exceptions such as fair use and the first sale doctrine. Any language granting fast track authority implicating intellectual property must recognize the importance of limitations and exceptions.
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
