Suppose that we were only allowed to raise a single demand in the context
of the Troika-Greece confrontation. Suppose that the demand had to satisfy
the following properties:

1. It's winnable.
2. Winning it would make a substantial difference to the well-being of a
bunch of people in Greece.
3. The demand would be popular in Greece.
4. The demand would be marketable in the West, something we could organize
a bunch of people around, such as labor leaders, health groups, Members of
Congress.

What should the demand be?

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mark Weisbrot, CEPR <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 9:06 AM
Subject: Are the European Authorities Destroying the Greek Economy in Order
to "Save" It?
To: [email protected]


     [image: CEPR logo]
<http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=BzgzWIjlU8Bgzf78mLdr0fE%2Ba9uoRu6y>
Are the European Authorities Destroying the Greek Economy in Order to
"Save" It?
<http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=4SVN8gEJ%2FqOd7d%2BNGH9tI%2FE%2Ba9uoRu6y>

By Mark Weisbrot
------------------------------

This article was published by Al Jazeera America
<http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=jTR5WXjWZJhnYtSJ1lva7PE%2Ba9uoRu6y>
on March 30, 2015.
------------------------------

There is a tense standoff right now between the Greek government and the
European authorities – sometimes known as the Troika because it includes
the European Commission, the European Central Bank (ECB), and the
International Monetary Fund (IMF). ECB President Mario Draghi denied
<http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=gL%2FG2qsUjw%2F5HBb4dH96t%2FE%2Ba9uoRu6y>
this week that his institution is trying to blackmail the Greek government.

But blackmail is actually an understatement of what the ECB and its
European partners are doing to Greece. It has become increasingly clear
that they are trying to harm the Greek economy in order to increase
pressure on the new Greek government to agree to their demands.

The first sign that this was the European authorities’ strategy came on
February 4 -- just 10 days after the Syriza government was elected -- when
the European Central bank cut off
<http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=3iQOt3qFbln54Lp5mZ3ybfE%2Ba9uoRu6y>
the main source of financing for Greek banks. This move was clearly made in
bad faith, since there was no bureaucratic or other reason to do this; it
was more than three weeks before the deadline for the decision.
Predictably, the cut off spurred a huge outflow of capital from the Greek
banking system, destabilizing the economy and sending financial markets
plummeting. More intimidation followed, including a slightly veiled threat
<http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=7J2DBkBlhAYztf5%2Fu6yamPE%2Ba9uoRu6y>
that Emergency Liquidity Assistance – Greece’s last credit lifeline from
the ECB – could also be cut. The European authorities appeared to be hoping
that a “shock and awe” assault on the Greek economy would force the new
government to immediately capitulate.

It didn’t work out that way. The Syriza party had a mandate from the Greek
electorate to improve their living standards after six years of
Troika-induced depression and more than 25 percent unemployment. The new
Greek government backed off its demand for a debt “haircut,” and made other
compromises, but wasn’t going to simply surrender as if there had been no
election. The European authorities finally blinked on February 20 and
agreed to grant a four month extension, through June, of the prior
“bailout” agreement – the quotes are necessary because most Greeks have not
been “bailed out,” but rather thrown overboard, having lost more than 25
percent
<http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=1lGlmLxtAKzoIrhmIaGiMvE%2Ba9uoRu6y>
of their national income since 2008.

The immediate condition for the February 20th agreement was that the Greek
government present a list of reforms that they would undertake, which they
did, and which European officials approved. Remaining issues were to be
negotiated by April 20th, so that the final installment of IMF money – some
7.2 billion euros – could be released. One might assume that the February
20th agreement would allow these negotiations to take place without
European officials causing further immediate and unnecessary damage to the
Greek economy. One would be wrong: a gun to the head of Syriza was not
enough for these “benefactors;” they wanted fingers in a vise, too.

And they got it. The ECB refused to renew the Greek banks’ access to its
main, cheapest source of credit that they had before the January 25
election. And they refused to lift the cap on the amount that Greek banks
could loan to the Greek government – something that they did not do to the
previous government. The result has been to create a serious cash flow
problem for both the government and the banks. Because of the ECB’s credit
squeeze, the government could soon find itself in a situation that the 2012
government faced when it delayed payments to hospitals and other
contractors in order to make debt payments; and it could even face default
at the end of April.

The amounts of money involved are quite trivial for the European Central
Bank. The government has to come up about 2 billion euros of debt payments
in April. The ECB has recently shelled out 26.3 billion euros to buy
eurozone governments’ bonds as part of its 850 billion euro quantitative
easing
<http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=YXtpomq%2BUK4ZfFTv%2F7i9O%2FE%2Ba9uoRu6y>
program over the next year and a half. The ECB’s excuses for causing this
cash crunch in Greece ring hollow: for example, it argues that banks under
the previous government didn’t have to have the limit that the ECB is
imposing on banks now, because the prior government had committed to a
reform program that would fix its finances. But so has this one.

It could hardly be more obvious that this is not about money or fiscal
sustainability, but about politics. The European authorities want to show
who is boss. And also, this is a government that they didn’t want. And they
really don’t want this government to succeed, which would encourage Spanish
voters
<http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=cHtS3xaHGBFqfVhfAjfFOPE%2Ba9uoRu6y>
to opt for a democratic alternative (Podemos) later this year.

The IMF had projected
<http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=6GWZS81YA975Fg3G4RllsvE%2Ba9uoRu6y>
[PDF] the economy to grow by 2.9 percent this year, and until the last
month or so there was good reason to believe that – as in 2014, after years
of gross over-estimates – their forecast would be on target. This growth
would likely have kept Syriza’s approval ratings high, together with its
measures to provide food and electricity to needy households, and other
progressive changes. The ECB’s actions, by destabilizing the economy and
discouraging investment and consumption, will almost certainly slow
Greece’s recovery, and could also be expected to undermine the government’s
support.

If carried too far, European officials’ actions could also inadvertently
force Greece out of the euro. It’s a dangerous strategy, and they should
stop undermining the economic recovery that Greece will need if it is to
achieve fiscal sustainability


Mark Weisbrot
<http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=i%2F6jlqkJdTFrU3Evyp4Bp%2FE%2Ba9uoRu6y>
is co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, in
Washington, D.C. and president of Just Foreign Policy
<http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=%2FpGV6XeCww29HB7pgEy0vHCnx272yRRh>.
He is also the author of the forthcoming book *Failed: What the "Experts"
Got Wrong About the Global Economy* (Oxford University Press, 2015).

More from CEPR
Reports
<http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=vL%2Bwo2eAe5cGNqbZqMzZ2%2FE%2Ba9uoRu6y>
Op-eds & Columns
<http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=bacKp7f6peN%2FcQxlaFGayvE%2Ba9uoRu6y>
Data Bytes
<http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=8vG1A1%2F9hxNUgG%2F3%2BgUDWvE%2Ba9uoRu6y>
Beat the Press
<http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=GIWE8wndyo4jeEzjDKjgfPE%2Ba9uoRu6y>
CEPR Blog
<http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=jxodUe%2FuYCzLuI8BfS2qMPE%2Ba9uoRu6y>
The Americas Blog
<http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=frijEADu9sMtK02oVSCix%2FE%2Ba9uoRu6y>
Haiti Relief and Reconstruction Watch
<http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=%2BDZZRIe0BLIn9nDVxCbq8vE%2Ba9uoRu6y>
Events
<http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=QBUtzTOlt1SaH3f4ujQZz%2FE%2Ba9uoRu6y>

Donate
Please consider making a donation
<http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=QqyHsfwMpaL%2B5fjzTi0KTPE%2Ba9uoRu6y>
to CEPR. In addition to foundations, we rely on people like you to support
our work.

Federal employees can support CEPR through the Combined Federal Campaign,
CFC #79613.

[image: CFC Badge]

About
The Center for Economic and Policy Research is an independent, nonpartisan
think tank that was established to promote democratic debate on the most
important economic and social issues that affect people's lives. CEPR's
Advisory Board includes Nobel Laureate economists Robert Solow and Joseph
Stiglitz; Janet Gornick, Professor at the CUNY Graduate Center and Director
of the Luxembourg Income Study; and Richard Freeman, Professor of Economics
at Harvard University.


<http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=EGmkWog%2FBoCfnMxU%2BodRePE%2Ba9uoRu6y>


<http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=BX%2FvuZ0VKcQWeoxGvobBwfE%2Ba9uoRu6y>

[image: CEPR RSS Feed]
<http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=d8skZW%2FouA2ALdESuNuIYfE%2Ba9uoRu6y>

Center for Economic and Policy Research, 1611 Connecticut Ave, NW, Suite
400, Washington, DC 20009
Phone: (202) 293-5380, Fax: (202) 588-1356
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to